9 comments

[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 30.2 ms ] thread
Why not (n)vim or emacs and some plugins?
Beautiful

I'm too far down the org roam rabbit hole to ever come out but... If you get org support give me a holler. Looks really nice

looks promising but i prefer nvim instead of learning a new tool.
So you say it's inspired by Obsidian (and call it an "alternative") but notably missing from your table of syntax support are [[wikilinks]], which for many (I would guess most) users would prevent this from being a drop-in replacement, even for just viewing a vault. Is there a reason you chose not to support them?
It is very pretty but curious if there are any advantages over Obsidian?
A paragraph or two on your motivation for this and the benefits of this approach would be helpful. Thanks!
Wow, looks really nice, and the README’s super comprehensive. I don’t know if I missed it or not, but do you support inter-note link navigation (like Obsidian WikiLinks)? I know markdown-oxide did this with LSP actions, but I’d love to know more about your plans for navigation/lsp-like features, if any
Thanks!! WikiLinks feature will be dropping today, as for LSP is currently on consideration :)