17 comments

[ 4.8 ms ] story [ 29.8 ms ] thread
Given TikToks insane creator adoption rate is Meta developing these models to build out a content creation platform to compete?
> Visual prompting: Click on the person or object in the video that’s making a sound to isolate their audio.

How does that work? Correlating sound with movement?

I wonder if the segmentation would work with a video of a ventriloquist and a dummy?
Can I create a continuous “who farted” detector? Would be great at parties
I wonder if this would be nice for hearing aid users for reducing the background restaurant babble that overwhelms the people you want to hear.
I recently discovered Audacity includes plug-ins for audio separation that work great (e.g. split into vocals track and instruments track). The model it uses also originated at Facebook (demucs).
This is hilariously bad with music. Like I can type in the most basic thing like "string instruments" which should theoretically be super easy to isolate. You can generally one-shot this using spectral analysis libraries. And it just totally fails.
This is super cool. Of course, it is possible to separate instrument sounds using specialized tools, but can't wait to see how people use this model for bunch of other use cases, where its not trivial to use those specialized tools:

* remove background noise of tech products, but keep the nature

* isolate the voice of a single person and feed into STT model to improve accuracy

* isolating sound of events in games and many more

Finally a way to perhaps remove laugh tracks in the near future.
I tried this to try to extract some speech from an audio track with heavy noise from wind (filmed out on a windy sea shore without mic windscreen), and the result unfortunately was less intelligible than the original.

I got much better results, though still not perfect, with the voice isolator in ElevenLabs.

FB has been a pioneer in voice and audio, somehow. A couple of years ago FB-Research had a little repo on GitHub that was the best noise-removal / voice-isolation out there. I wanted to use it in Wisprnote and politely emailed the authors. Never heard back (that's okay), but I was so impressed with the perceptual quality and "wind removal" (so hard).
I wonder if it works for speaker diarization out of the box. I've found that open source speaker diarization that doesn't require a lot of tweaking is basically non-existent.
A lot of comments here exhibit the Gell-Mann amnesia effect writ large.
Your comment is just a meta-comment and that's just as bad. I suggest gently correcting people instead of just pointing out very non-specifically that someone is wrong.