Causing a large commercial airliner to crash by remotely cutting off fuel to engines would be quite a feat. Would exploit be most manageable at departure? Location is almost fixed. Plane control is most vulnerable immediately at take-off. What, if any, vital control domains are transitioned outboard vs onboard at takeoff? Etc...
--
This article is at least nuanced, but reads more like muck-raking and rehabilitation than systemic analysis.
Regarding the article's language: the focus on "single point of failure" reads like weasel words regarding the "core network": A "point" of failure is extremely context sensitive. To the occupants of the vehicle, the plane itself is a single point of failure.
Summary: Since we cannot possibly accept the actions of the pilot in the context of our worldview, we must find some alternative, no matter how improbable.
3 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 16.8 ms ] threadCausing a large commercial airliner to crash by remotely cutting off fuel to engines would be quite a feat. Would exploit be most manageable at departure? Location is almost fixed. Plane control is most vulnerable immediately at take-off. What, if any, vital control domains are transitioned outboard vs onboard at takeoff? Etc...
--
This article is at least nuanced, but reads more like muck-raking and rehabilitation than systemic analysis.
Regarding the article's language: the focus on "single point of failure" reads like weasel words regarding the "core network": A "point" of failure is extremely context sensitive. To the occupants of the vehicle, the plane itself is a single point of failure.