10 comments

[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 36.5 ms ] thread
> 773466

> two hundred ten cubed twelfths plus twelve cubed minus twelve

Intuitive!

This website is a useless exercise, but the idea in the submission title "using fewer syllables to express numbers" has utility.

As a musician, I frequently need to count to a rhythm, and the pesky number seven's two syllables throws my cadence off. So I count a bar of 8 like this:

> one, two, three, four, five, six, sev, eight

Occasionally I'll need to count up to as high as 16, which is especially tricky. It'd be easiest to do it in hexadecimal-style, but somehow I can't bring myself to count a part out as:

> one, two, three, four, five, six, sev, eight, nine, a, b, c, d, e, f, g

If only I could convince musicians to use zero-based indexing instead of one-based.

In my father's accent/dialect (South Wales), the number seven is monosyllabic: it sounds more like "sevn" (with the v pronounced quite softly). The number "eleven" is similarly monosyllabic, and sounds more like "levn". I often use this when counting to a rhythm. Shame the numbers from thirteen onwards do have more than one syllable.
I got one that ended with “minus ninety halves”. How is “ninety halves” better than “forty-five”?
I'd love to see this done for French numbers, and no cheating with huitante or nonante.
Use Chinese to get the least amount of syllables.
I tried "4765" (four syllables), and got "sixty-nine squared plus four" (6 syllables).

The ICAO phonetic alphabet specifically pronounces "4" as "fouwer", and "9" as "niner", so as to increase redundancy on a noisy channel.

You got "four thou-sand se-ven hun-dred six-ty-five" :)
Nope, I got "four seven six five", which is exactly how I would read that number if it were a street address, or a phone extension, or an inumber, or the like. You will notice that the site doesn't give any context about the usage of these numbers.