I feel insulted when an LLM answers the phone
I recently called an upscale restaurant to order a pizza, and my call was answered by an LLM. There was no disclosure; it was just a young woman's voice saying "Hi you've reached <business name>, how can I help?" It wasn't until I noticed the unusual delays and ever-so-subtly robotic speech cadence that I realized I wasn't talking to a human.
This felt crappy. It felt like I was being tricked; that this company wanted me to think I was speaking with a human. To think you're speaking with a human when you aren't is embarrassing, and in the process of recognizing that the voice isn't real there is an inevitable moment of awkward self-consciousness when you aren't sure whether to speak as if there is another person listening or not.
If you don't want to pay people to answer your phones, use a phone tree. Don't insult your customers by trying to trick them into thinking they're getting real service.
4 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 20.9 ms ] threadOf course, you know this "person" on the other end was an LLM, which I figured once she handed over her phone. I was livid, and despite having better things to do, wasted the next few hours sending a notice to the legal team. They paid a small change to shut down the issue.
Looking back, if the app had at least stated she was talking to a machine and given her an option to escalate to human support, the situation would not have deteriorated.
I feel LLMs can never be used for negative interactions like complaints, or transactional interactions like placing orders. Scope should be limited to answering factual, generic questions, like "What's my order's ETA?", etc.