61 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 86.3 ms ] thread
For whom are they writing this? For the sane people it's not needed and for the not-so-sane it doesn't really matter ...
They can say whatever they want but Usain Bolt gave me his gold medal so now Im the fastest 100m runner in the world
It's such a joke that we're even having to discuss this. Has there ever been such a thin-skinned, self-absorbed leader of a major power before? Even his biggest fans have to admit, if only to themselves, that he acts like a toddler.
Fun fact, Oscar winners don't fully own their statues since 1950. AMPAS reserves the right to buy it back for $1 if they want to sell it. Ownership of the statue is conditional, meaning it can't be freely sold or disposed of.
"oh, I must have lost it. Since you're claiming it's worth one dollar, here's a fiver, keep the change"
He can have my old 10 metre swimming proficiency certificate.
Sloppy seconds seems to be his thing.

I can't imagine being somebody who voted for him and thinking this is what an "alpha" man does, bitch and moan about prizes and recognition instead of actually doing things of value.

I wouldn't be surprised if there is a large cohort of people who never admit they voted for Trump in the future out of embarrassment.

The underlying issue here is that the Nobel Peace Prize is a useless, politicized joke. It appears to be almost designed to give newspapers something to write about.

It's a shame it gets tied with scientific prizes which represent actual merit.

Now you need to look into the "Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel" - Economics wasn't part of Nobel's original endowment so the Swedish Central bank funded it in the 60s.
No "Nobel Prize" thread is complete without this pedantic observation, however otherwise off-topic.
You mean like the 1949 Nobel Prize for Medicine being awarded to the person who developed lobotomy surgery?
An imperfect record doesn't mean the whole process is a sham.

But with the Peace Prize, the failures are numerous, and it becomes harder to claim they are outliers.

The Nobel Peace Prize is meaningless. No matter who or why and to whome it was given. It has nothing to do with the other Nobel Prizes.
Many in Norway and Sweden distanced themselves from the Nobel Peace Prize at the time it was awarded to Machado because it was obvious it was such a bad decision.

Julian Assange even filed a criminal complaint in Sweden last month to try to stop the Swedish Nobel Foundation paying out over $1 million dollars to her, arguing it's going against Alfred Nobel's will, and they have a responsibility to respect his will.

He wrote last month: "Using her elevated position as the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, Machado may well have tipped the balance in favour of war, facilitated by the named suspects."

I find it funny that what many saw as a terrible decision has now come to pass, and the Nobel Institute is scrambling to save face.

https://x.com/wikileaks/status/2001260159432290686

I'm just wondering if they'll end up revising the blurb about her on their website to include the words "craven pandering."
This is not quite the outcome I foresaw. I genuinely expected Trump to entirely ghost Rodriguez, because she had the gall to accept the Peace Prize, whereas she should, of course, have refused it outright and demanded it to be awarded to Trump instead.

Absent that scenario, I fully expected a tearful ceremony in the Rose Garden, where she would hand the medal to him, as the only True Recipient. That didn't happen either, and what we got right now seems a bit... forced? Like: Trump's advisors got through to him (no simple feat!) and positioned her as the only slightly viable path toward success in Latin America, and got him to take the L?

Anyway, total insanity...

Maybe the denigration of the award process should be the basis for revoking the award in question
The other day I read this article about Grigori Perelman, Russian mathematician who declined to accept any medal or prize related to him solving the Poincaré conjecture. He declined the fields medals and millennium prize on the basis that he didn't view himself as a hero, and thought such awards were irrelevant.

And then you have Trump, on the complete other side of that spectrum.

I had a physics professor I worked with who had a Nobel Prize.

He didn't win it. It was won by a team of students / collaborators / mentees, who felt he deserved it. I can't disagree with them. Among the nicest people in the world.

I don't think anyone meant it in the sense of "You're a Nobel Prize Winner," so much as "We couldn't have done this without your mentorship, and you deserve to hold onto this." He certainly doesn't consider himself to be a Nobel Prize winner.

Laureates are already such a mixed bunch why not make it fungible.

What's the worst that's gonna happen, the Kissinger estate gets a second prize?

(comment deleted)
Epstein, NATO, Russia

Ignore distractions such as the Nobel

[flagged]
I notice 18 out of 20 top stories on reddit world news are about Trump.

Please just stop giving him attention.

so the discussion on circumcision gets flagged, but symbolic peace prize squabbles doesn't?
Why bother even saying this ?

If Terence Tao gave me, or a thrift shop, his Fields Medal, does that make me, or them, a great mathematician ?

The Nobel Peace Prize is also a bit odd. The other Nobel prizes seem more to be given out based on merit, but the peace prize seems highly political. Not sure why Machado got one in the first place, nor Obama for that matter. Trump would be one of the most undeserving ever, given that he seems to want to start wars with everyone, other than his wannabe buddy Putin.

I was just googling for prior peace prize winners (y'know - people who the Nobel committee actually awarded them to), and didn't realize that Al Gore had been given one too. For his climate change awareness work. Maybe the world will be a more peaceful place if it doesn't get too hot?

Of course they aren't. Only a 6 year old would think so.
(comment deleted)
[flagged]