3 comments

[ 3.2 ms ] story [ 17.7 ms ] thread
I don't think I will ever be convince that someone has a better syntax for HTML. Markdown is not bad for writing a quick document. But authoring a whole webpage nothing beats pure html. I'm still on the fence for CoffeeScript as well.

More power to you for trying.

This accepts all html tags and attributes so it can be used equivalently to html. Any command line program can be added as a parser.