Homeland Security is targeting Americans with this secretive legal weapon (washingtonpost.com) 27 points by jaredwiener 5mo ago ↗ HN
[–] dataflow 5mo ago ↗ Google believes an administrative subpoena "compels" them to release customer information? Is that true? I thought that's only for judicial subpoenas. [–] cpncrunch 5mo ago ↗ No, they rejected this one, so obviously that isnt the case.
[–] shrubble 5mo ago ↗ The subject of the article signed his first and last name and was wondering how the officers tracked him down?We don’t know his last name, but I think first and last name plus zip code is enough to uniquely identify a great many people.
[–] 0xy 5mo ago ↗ Administrative subpoenas are enforceable, and are not secretive. They are a routine tool.See Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Walling and United States v. Morton Salt Co.This has been routine and codified for 80 years.
5 comments
[ 2.5 ms ] story [ 24.5 ms ] threadWe don’t know his last name, but I think first and last name plus zip code is enough to uniquely identify a great many people.
See Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Walling and United States v. Morton Salt Co.
This has been routine and codified for 80 years.