Show HN: Try [name-redacted] AI video model

2 points by _btkr ↗ HN
Hi HN,

I’m building an AI video playground where people can try different text-to-video models in one place. We recently added support for [name-redacted], [name-redacted] latest video model, and I thought some of you might like to experiment with it.

[url-redacted]

A few things that stood out when testing [name-redacted]:

It often generates multi-shot sequences instead of a single static shot

Motion can be quite smooth compared to earlier T2V models

It supports native audio generation

Prompts with camera movement or cinematic language tend to work well

The goal of the site isn’t just [name-redacted] — it’s to let people compare different video models under a similar interface. I found it frustrating that every model lives in a separate UI with different credit systems and prompt formats.

Some honest notes:

Outputs are still inconsistent

Prompting quality matters a lot

Long narrative coherence is hard for all current models

Running these models is expensive, so there are usage limits

If you’re experimenting with generative video, I’d love to hear:

What prompts work well for you

Where current models fail

What tooling you wish existed around text-to-video

Happy to answer questions about the product or setup.

5 comments

[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 20.0 ms ] thread
Claims to give free first video gen for testing after signup but does not give enough credits to do so and still asks for payment.
Hey, nice project! I actually built something similar — when Seedance 2.0 dropped, I noticed a ton of people struggling to access it, so I put together a platform as fast as I could to make it available. It's live now at seedance2-pro.com. You get 200 free credits on sign up — enough to try it out and see what the model can do. Text-to-video and image-to-video are working. Reference video isn't supported yet, but I'm working on it. Just an indie dev trying to help people get their hands on this model. Would love any feedback if you give it a try!
Been testing out these models for the past week and honestly pretty impressed with the speed-to-quality ratio. The image generation is solid, though I did notice some inconsistencies with complex prompts. For anyone looking for more resources on generative AI workflows, I found this site helpful: https://seedance2.so - has some decent tutorials and community discussions. Overall, the API integration was smoother than expected. Documentation could use more examples for edge cases, but the core functionality delivers. Worth checking out if you're building something that needs fast inference times.