10 comments

[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 28.1 ms ] thread
Can someone explain what exactly "US Government" in the #1 spot for Obama means? Seems odd that government money could be used to support a candidate incumbent or not.
Funny, in the rest of the world, this would be normal -> parties get funding from the government, no funding from private entities allowed.
People employed by the US government.
The list is badly labeled. What it should be labeled is "employers of people who donate money to the candidates".

I'm flagging the submission, because although this kind of information is interesting, this is a very crappy presentation of it. For an example of a better presentation: http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/index.php

I believe the money in question comes from the organizations' employees, owners, and PACs not from the organizations directly.
And before this starts playing into recent popular narratives, 4 years ago the bankers were Obama's top donors. It's also important to remember that these are donations from employees of these firms and not the firms themselves.
Top five seems a little short sighted, I would rather see "Funders over X dollars". It would provide more insight into the candidates corporate (or otherwise) sponsors.