21 comments

[ 4.5 ms ] story [ 50.0 ms ] thread
“The final rolling is therefore done on a sandwich of two sheets, face to face.”
Whomever wrote that clearly has never made or eaten a sandwich. Without something in between the two layers, it’s hardly a sandwich.
To quote the Blues Brothers, that's a "wish sandwich", when you have two slices of bread and you wish you had some meat.
> Yet many people persist in calling aluminum foil "tinfoil."

> We chemists get annoyed at things like that.

> Now, about aluminum foil.

Actually, most chemists are profoundly annoyed at the Americans' inability to spell aluminium properly...

Sir Humphry Davy first isolated the stuff and he called it aluminum, so that's good enough for me.
It isn't clear if that is a dig at Americans having their own spelling of aluminum/aluminium, or ignorance that Americans have their own spelling.
> Actually, most chemists are profoundly annoyed at the Americans' inability to spell aluminium properly...

That's just patently false. Anyone who's had any sort of education in chemistry/physics is aware of the history of the word and doesn't give a damn.

Try to make them pronounce nuclear instead of nucelar :D
Humphrey Davy, the British chemist who performed early work to isolate the element, and who initially named it, called it 'aluminum'. Americans mostly followed him, but the British changed later at the complaints of the French, Swedish, and Germans that it used essentially English roots rather than Latin ones. Which, considering that we now have elements named such things as Tennessine, seems to be a bit of an argument that doesn't quite apply anymore.
I always heard the shiny side reflected heat better. So that side should face food you are trying to heat up in the oven.

Any truth to that I wonder?

No. Aluminum foil has the same material properties with respect to convection and conduction of heat no matter which side faces out. The only heat that would be different would be radiated heat, which your food won't have a ton of, and even then, the dull side is still quite reflective. It's maybe one of those "technically" correct statements that the shiny side reflects more heat, but for the application of cooking, the impact is effectively zero. The retention of steam is going to be such a larger factor the side you use will effectively make no difference.
The shiny and dull sides look like perfect mirrors in IR wavelengths.
I recall similar advice around mylar heat blankets. Perhaps those got mixed up?
The feature size of the matte vs shiny sides are much smaller than the wavelength of the bulk of the radiated light in either a microwave or conventional oven.
Which side is better at reflecting woke beams from space?
so if you skipped the final rolling it would be shiny on both sides?

is this being produced?

Shiny side is for wrapping the end of banana, the matte for the other end.
And in French it's often called "papier alu" when there's no trace of paper at all.
Like an e-ink (or e-paper) screen