HN Explorer

20 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 43.9 ms ] thread
kasabali
Bigger issue here is they're removing everything that depends on gtk2.
canistel
- GTK2 is only one of the supported widget sets for Lazarus. It supports Qt5 & 6 too. I feel Lazarus should switch to Qt5 or 6 until GTK3 is mature.

- Hexchat IRC client is another popular application that is still stuck with GTK2.

account42
It seems no distro is safe from deletionists.
hulitu
I'm sure they can be easily ported to GTK3, GTK4 and then GTK5 /s
anthk
That's the curse on the Unix world. At least FreeBSD, NetBSD (OpenBSD not by design, but that's understandable because of security) have their compat libraries on plus some of them (even GTK1) in their ports. On 9front, I just adapted Russ Cox' Xword (some crossword player for XWord files, it has a converter from Across Lite Puz files to Xword) for modern times, barely a few lines changes in some drawing function for software made for Plan9 4ed or close.

PD: Guix can do the same as fbsd and nbsd because, well, setting up an isolated environment with time-bound tools it's basically what Guix was born for, reproducibility. Scientific repo for a paper must be run point to point as we had a Slackware setup with Slackbuilds in 2007? That's the point of Guix. You would say... docker. But docker it's overkill.

AlexeyBrin
Didn't FreeBSD recently dropped their 32 bits x86 version ? At some point every open source OS will remove the parts for which no one is willing to put the work on maintaining it.
jonp888
If you plough through the first pages so far as I can tell it seems like actually it won't be removed.

Certainly not FPC, because the hard dependency on GTK2 was a misunderstanding.

For Lazarus it seems like dependency on GTK2 is considered a bug and not a fundamental incompatibility, because there are too many GTK2 applications to completely remove it from Debian.

potus_kushner
maybe the best and simplest solution would be to not remove gtk2 from debian. the last release is stable and there's no technical reason to remove it (as it still works and compiles just fine), only political ones.
guywithahat
I don't like how political debian has been becoming in a number of facets, I've moved all of my machines over to Ubuntu and Arch and am happier because of it
enricotr
The site seem slashdotted by us.
jamesgeck0
Is this the sort of thing that Flatpak would be useful for? Or are there sandbox-related complications when using it to package a compiler?
okanat
Flatpak is basically running an isolated separate distro. A software inside a Flatpak has to communicate with the outside world to do anything useful which is yet another API surface that needs to be maintained and it will be dropped just like gtk2 when people just don't want to maintain it.

I think the way the Linux ecosystem works is fundamentally against maintaining old binaries unless they are a text-only program.

fuzztester
looks like slashdot effect is ongoing for the site.
random29ah
Meanwhile, slackware-current has the good old gtk1 and I believe it's only for xmms.