30 comments

[ 3.3 ms ] story [ 56.7 ms ] thread
As much as I applaud the intention, the genie has been out of the bottle on this one for many years already.
I remember they successfully got Google out of a military contract in the first admin (and briefly vilified by the right for that). that's not going to work now. Workers have a lot less power and the CEO is buddies with Trump
If we're going to have to rely on self-regulation for this, we're already doomed.
Google employees must think this is pre 2024. The employer has the power and doesn’t mind laying off people who don’t tow the company line and all of the CEOs bend over and bribe the President - ie “settling” frivolous lawsuits brought by Trump himself over “censorship” when he was out of office
I understand the vision, but how does this work on a global scale. e.g. American employees refuse to build this, but China's don't.

Edit: I originally ended with "What would have happened if Germany had a nuclear bomb and America didn't?", but I think it distracted from the point I was trying to make so moving this to an edit. I'm not trying to ask "is the US the bad guy". I'm trying to ask how to balance personal anti war sentiments with the realities of the world (specifically in this case keeping up in an arms race).

Don't need to use China even, Microsoft, or Palantir, etc will continue to support the US military, likely using Google technology in the process (Guava, gRPC maybe?, k8s assuredly? etc).

Sorry but if you truly believe in technology not using in bad context, the only way to avoid it is to change careers. The issue with news like this is it's hard to actually trust the protesters, they probably are happy to clear their conscience personally while continuing to reap the benefits of living in the tech industry. Have your cake and eat it too.

Sometimes people do quit - they're probably the ones you want to hire if you care about ethics. Most don't though.

As I understand anthropic refused two things: domestic surveillance in the US and weapons automated such that they could kill without a human in the loop. I don't think either of these would hamper the US against China in any meaningful way.
This gets a giant eye roll from me. Are you really so naive that you thought working on AI for a giant tech company, creating software that is capable of finding deep patterns in massive amounts of data... and it wasn't going to used by the Defense / Intelligence industry? If you are so against the US government, and you are working for ANY big tech company you are aiding the Intelligence and Defense industry. Government uses AWS and Azure. Intelligence agencies use the data and tools of Meta / Google / Apple / etc.
You're not entirely wrong, but maybe you could consider supporting people who move in the right direction rather than rolling your eyes at them.
[dead]
Am I the only one who remembers the prime directive of google, much easier to understand than 'organizing the worlds information' etc. etc. It was simpler.

Don't be evil.

Google has been evil for at least a decade, if not longer than that.

This is just pigslop masquerading as a moral stand.

What happened to the OG Google that cared about users, prioritized honest search, fast performance, and didn't murder pages with ads?

Given Jeff Dean’s political activity on X, I’m guessing he’s aligned to the resistance too. Not sure the rest of management is interested in caving.
The line should be "no" not "limited domestic use".
They need to unionize quickly to protect their employment and include this as part of their bargaining
"Google employees make demands of US Military from nap pods, ball pit."

I assume by red lines they are referring to a life-sized tic-tac-toe game board painted in a hallway.

Honestly I want tech companies is to make our military strong, just not under this guy. He’s going to turn around and use it directly on Americans.
Very much doubt Google will take principled stance
US leaders have realized how much power China CCP has over its citizens. They want to do that. Same with EU.

What makes US US are their transparent integral markets and ability for information , people and goods to move freely.

By using AI for mass surveillance, information can’t move that freely. Free speech gets suppressed. Can’t call the emperor naked.

The Emporer is naked with a poopy diaper. But we can’t say that aloud.

(comment deleted)