17 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 42.7 ms ] thread
I generally don't trust cancer-communication if it's juiced up like this incredible headline. There has been huge amounts of progress. We don't need silicon valley idiots starting to make proclamations. It's doing fine without your mediocrity.
Sounds a little too close, in both name and concept, to Therac for my comfort.
Theryq - why would they go with this name when everyone in the field knows about the Therac-25 radiation overexposure incidents?
(comment deleted)
Saw at the podiatrist that someone named a shoe company Kuru, presumably not after the prison disease affecting gait.
Hey, FLASH finally hit Hacker News! I remember my professors talking about this in graduate school. It's a fairly well-established effect: the tumor selectivity of radiation is much better at ultra-high dose rates. It is still unclear exactly why. But there are a lot of studies about it:

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41571-022-00697-z

> Currently, the most plausible theory emerging from her team’s research points to metabolism: Healthy and cancerous cells may process reactive oxygen species—unstable oxygen-containing molecules generated during radiation—in very different ways.

Reminds me of this which I (think) was linked here a while ago: https://www.nature.com/articles/s12276-020-0384-2

It really does feel like all these piecemeal cancer treatments are converging on something resembling a cure.

What is the intensity at the focal point versus areas surrounding it?
The sidebar mentions heavier particles having a pronounced Bragg Peak[0] and also existing approaches like multi-beam targeting. The FLASH effect in the article is yet another tool to limit the surrounding damage.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bragg_peak

Does this have to do with cell division?
The major issue isn't the speed of delivery, and the cancer.

The key question is how do you spare normal tissue, and how do you prove the normal tissue is spared in the long term. Current answer is: You break it apart into multiple sessions, the anti-thesis of FLASH.

Source: my wife is a radiation oncologist.

It saddens me with a survivor in my family that the primary therapies are still cut, burn, and poison. They are horrific to experience and just slightly better than the disease.

There are so many biological cures on the horizon; they can't arrive fast enough.