“In 2021, the research firm IPVM independently tested Flock's LPR cameras, concluding in a report that it misidentified which state a license plate was from for around 1 in 10 reads, and that the system regularly misclassified license plate state, vehicle type, and make. IPVM said that Flock subsequently blocked it from purchasing its cameras for testing.”
Unless I'm missing something, the pertinent license-plate misreading happened when the vehicle was pulled over. It's one thing if a false positive shows a stolen vehicle or license plate where it isn't, but all that means is any resources put into locating it will go wasted.
Pulling over a vehicle, and incorrectly thinking it is stolen, is an entirely different and much greater mistake. In this case the actual vehicles actual license plate did not match anything stolen.
I'm against law enforcement vehicles having continuously-operating license-plate cameras, but if there were cameras to identify the vehicle currently being pulled over, I'd be fine with that, as it would likely have a much, much lower error rate than the human chain currently doing the verifying.
It's truly astonishing that the cops in the video were not disciplined for deliberately attacking the victim with a vicious police dog. Apparently the standard of conduct for American police has sunk so low that it is considered acceptable for law enforcement to violently assault a suspect who poses no obvious threat to them or anyone else.
$35,000 for being attacked by a police dog, hospitalized and jailed for hours. Nope. I'd ride that to the supreme court. He is lucky he wasn't shot for a 'misread'.
>• Mass Surveillance: He expressed concern over his algorithms being employed in systems that could infringe on individual privacy rights, particularly in oppressive regimes or contexts lacking strict regulations.
I hope flock gets sued into oblivion, and I hope the officer that deployed a canine with no good reason gets sued into oblivion and loses his job. What a disgusting misuse of power.
9 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 27.1 ms ] threadWhatcha got to hide, Garrett?
Pulling over a vehicle, and incorrectly thinking it is stolen, is an entirely different and much greater mistake. In this case the actual vehicles actual license plate did not match anything stolen.
I'm against law enforcement vehicles having continuously-operating license-plate cameras, but if there were cameras to identify the vehicle currently being pulled over, I'd be fine with that, as it would likely have a much, much lower error rate than the human chain currently doing the verifying.
$35,000 for being attacked by a police dog, hospitalized and jailed for hours. Nope. I'd ride that to the supreme court. He is lucky he wasn't shot for a 'misread'.
Edit: here it is https://medium.com/@graham.wallington/the-evolution-of-yolo-...
>• Mass Surveillance: He expressed concern over his algorithms being employed in systems that could infringe on individual privacy rights, particularly in oppressive regimes or contexts lacking strict regulations.