Show HN: I built a tool that watches webpages and exposes changes as RSS (sitespy.app)

320 points by vkuprin ↗ HN
I built Site Spy after missing a visa appointment slot because a government page changed and I didn’t notice for two weeks.

It watches webpages for changes and shows the result like a diff. The part I think HN might find interesting is that it can monitor a specific element on a page, not just the whole page, and it can expose changes as RSS feeds.

So instead of tracking an entire noisy page, you can watch just a price, a stock status, a headline, or a specific content block. When it changes, you can inspect the diff, browse the snapshot history, or follow the updates in an RSS reader.

It’s a Chrome/Firefox extension plus a web dashboard.

Main features:

- Element picker for tracking a specific part of a page

- Diff view plus full snapshot timeline

- RSS feeds per watch, per tag, or across all watches

- MCP server for Claude, Cursor, and other AI agents

- Browser push, Email, and Telegram notifications

Chrome: https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/site-spy/jeapcpanag...

Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/site-spy/

Docs: https://docs.sitespy.app

I’d especially love feedback on two things:

- Is RSS actually a useful interface for this, or do most people just want direct alerts?

- Does element-level tracking feel meaningfully better than full-page monitoring?

49 comments

[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 87.9 ms ] thread
This is interesting, gonna try it on our next project! thumb up
Interesting... added to bookmarks. Could come in handy in the future
Quick feedback:

1. RSS is just fine for updates. Given the importance of your visa use-case, were you thinking of push notifications?

2. Your competition does element-level tracking. Maybe they choose XPath?

Cool stuff. You should make it OSS and ask a one time fee for it. I would run it on my own infra but pay you once(.com)
Very good!

This is something that existed in the past and I used successfully, but services like this tend to disappear

RSS is a useful interface, but: "Do most people just want direct alerts?" Yes, of course. RSS is beloved but niche. Depends who your target audience is. I personally would want an email, because that's how I get alerts about other things. RSS to me is for long form reading, not notifications I must notice. The answer to any product question like this totally depends on your audience and their normal routines.
Back in 2000 I worked for a company that was trying to turn something like this into the foundation for a search engine.

Essentially instead of having a bunch of search engines and AI spamming your site, the idea was that they would get a feed. You would essentially scan your own website.

As crawlers grew from an occasional visitor to an actual problem (an inordinate percent of all consumer traffic at the SaaS I worked for was bots rather than organic traffic, and would have been more without throttling) I keep wondering why we haven’t done this.

Google has already solved the problem of people lying about their content, because RSS feeds or user agent sniffing you can still provide false witness to your site’s content and purpose. But you’d only have to be scanned when there was something to see. And really you could play games with time delays on the feed to smear out bot traffic over the day if you wanted.

(comment deleted)
As a (former) reporter, site monitoring is a big part of what I do on a daily basis and I used many, many such services.

I can attest that, at least from the landing page, this seems to be a very good execution of the concept, especially the text-based diffing to easily spot what changed and, most importantly, how.

The biggest hurdle for such apps however are 'js-based browser-rendered sites' or whatever they're called nowadays. How does Site Spy handle such abominations?

Thanks, that’s a really good question. Site Spy uses a real browser flow, so it generally handles JS-rendered pages much better than simple HTML-only polling tools. In practice, the trickier cases tend to be sites with aggressive anti-bot protection or messy login/session flows rather than JS itself. I’m trying to make those limitations clearer so people don’t just hit a vague failure and feel let down
What do you do now if you don’t mind sharing?
JS-rendered websites are sometimes even better, they usually have some sort of internal API that you can access directly instead of relying on the website styling which may change at any moment.

I'm a fellow reporter who needs to keep tabs on some websites. I used various tools, including running my own Klaxon[1] instance, but these days I find it easier to just quickly vibe-code a crawler and use GitHub Actions to run it periodically. You can make it output an RSS feed, email you, archive it with archive.today, take a screenshot, or trigger whatever action you want.

1: https://github.com/themarshallproject/klaxon

Buddy I love you!

I have wanted this for so long! My job relies on following many German laws, bureaucracy pages and the like.

In the long run I want specific changes on external pages to trigger pull requests in my code (e.g. to update a tax threshold). This requires building blocks that don't exist, and that I can't find time to code and maintain myself.

I currently use Wachete, but since over a year, it triggers rate limits on a specific website and I just can't monitor German laws anymore. No tools seem to have a debounce feature, even though I only need to check for updates once per month.

Something I was planning on building but never got round - if anyone wants to do it then feel free to use this idea.

Lots of companies really have no idea what javascript is being inserted into their websites - marketing teams add all sorts of crazy scripts that don't get vetted by anyone and are often loaded dynamically and can be changed without anyone knowing.

A service that monitors a site and flags up when the code changes - even better if it actually scans and flags up malicious code.

How might this tool work in terms of “archiving” a site? This is just something I was wondering given the recent change and controversy about archiving service sites on Wikipedia.
With lots of people showing how Saas apps can be easily written these days, I'm not as interested in those articles, as people showing off new ideas of what I can do with these new found abilities. This is cool.
Love this - I had a similar idea years ago, specifically for looking at long-text privacy policies and displaying the `diff`... but obviously never built it.

What you've done here is that and so much more. Congrats!

i love a good rss tool. Thanks for sharing
that's quiet good. will give a try congrat !
I have my own hobby RSS server built around the Google Reader API. Two of my plugins are pretty similar to what you described: one checks a page’s current state against the last saved version and publishes an entry if anything changed, the other is basically a CSS selector-based feed builder. Always good to see RSS content here, thanks for posting!

On your questions: some people prefer RSS, others email, and services exist to convert between the two in both directions. My own rule of thumb is email for things that need actual attention and RSS for everything that can wait. If you’re thinking about turning this into a service, supporting both would make sense since people are pretty split on this.

This is cool. I'd use it to track when state wildlife agencies update their regulation pages — those change once a year with no announcement and I always miss it. Element-level tracking would be perfect for that vs watching the whole page. To answer your question: I'd want both RSS and direct alerts (email/push) depending on urgency.
Tool looks useful. But how is it that toggling between light/dark mode results in a multi-second freeze..? Scrolling drops frames, confirmed with dev tools.

Tested on m1 pro 2021 laptop and recent higher-end (4080, 14700k, etc) desktop. Same on both.

The fuck?

That looks nice, I use the free plan of https://visualping.io for some software changelogs, RSS feeds are a paid feature. Will check this out.
Great for opponent monitoring on political campaigns. We made an in-house version of this on Biden ‘20.