Show HN: Architecture question: running an LLM as core infrastructure (automazionezeli.com)
The idea is that the model doesn't just answer questions but orchestrates tools and interacts with real application logic.
The architecture I'm currently testing includes:
Runtime
tool orchestration parallel tool execution loop detection circuit breaker / timeout guards token budgeting Context
context compression dynamic token ceiling Caching
deterministic LLM response cache semantic cache using pgvector Memory
short-term session memory longer-term semantic memory Evaluation
prompt evaluation set to test tool reasoning and failures I'm trying to figure out which parts are actually necessary in production and which ones are over-engineering.
For people building LLM systems beyond simple chat interfaces:
how do you handle tool orchestration? do you implement memory layers or just rely on context? are semantic caches worth it in practice? Curious to hear how others structure this.
0 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 7.1 ms ] threadNo comments yet.