8 comments

[ 10.1 ms ] story [ 40.9 ms ] thread
Gross. Browser, tracker blocking, and VPN should ALWAYS be different entities. Forever and always. Their incentives are misaligned at a fundamental level. My machine is the module that should tie the various components together how I see fit.

What company runs this VPN? One of the awful ones I assume?

Another useless distraction which is only nominally privacy-focused while the core browser continues to lose market share.
They are attempting to gain market share with this. What else can they do, too many corporations only allow Chrome only, most React/Angular devs prefer Chrome and probably aren't going to switch anytime soon. Mobile browsers are stuck with their OS's core browser engine regardless of what you "download".
This seems like a win for user-privacy and also that potential independent revenue stream (freemium 50GB vs premium) they've been chasing since Google search became their only goose.

They should have done this years ago, but I applaud them for doing it now.

I'm not clear on why the naysayers are against this.

Is their VPN provided by some other company?
> in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and France
I wonder how do they track usage without login credentials. Can I just make a new FF profile and get another 50GB?