Can anyone tell me exactly what these laws do? Is it just going to ask for a birthday when I run `adduser`?
What's the point? Is it meant for one admin account to restrict other user accounts?
This seems to be a shorter list than the one collected by Ageless Linux (https://agelesslinux.org/distros.html), although the GH issues seem to have the status of some additional distros.
I... Kinda think this will work out ok? Hear me out: Linux is open source. Someone's gonna make an application/kernelmodule that lets you configure your reported age on a application/website basis.
In some jurisdictions it's illegal to target kids with advertisement, and I believe also to track them? Reporting your age as 8-12 is gonna be the new, but actually functional "no tracking" header.
Age verification is simple! A Kelvar strap must be attached to the user before the device will power up. A probe in the strap takes a drop of blood from the user and analyzes the protein markers to determine the user's age. (See the Stanford U. study for details.)
Surprised G. Orwell or A. Huxley didn't think of it first.
I read some of the Ubuntu thread about potential implementations and it sure made me pine for some rose tinted good old days when AccountsServices, xdg-portals, dbus, systemd-login, et al. weren’t things one had to know or care about. Everything seems so complicated these days.
Be careful, you open yourselves up to be used by companies like iDenfy, AgeChecker.Net, IDscan.net, and others as they would HATE to see a local-first solution like what's been proposed in CA and IL to take hold.
They want to kill those bills so that their laws that they passed in TN and TX are expanded and they make more money.
I don't really like either solution, but I definitely don't want to help the companies that want to keep a copy of my ID and face scan.
15 comments
[ 5.1 ms ] story [ 37.2 ms ] threadSee also https://github.com/AntiSurv/oss-anti-surveillance for a project to patch out any future age verification code.
I prefer a satirical 'ShouldItAgeVerify' page that points the ridiculousness of shoving verification at unexpected places.
I love omarchy, but manchild/edgelord behaviour from the lead doesn’t exactly instill confidence.
In some jurisdictions it's illegal to target kids with advertisement, and I believe also to track them? Reporting your age as 8-12 is gonna be the new, but actually functional "no tracking" header.
Law doesn't work like this.
This is not law, this is impersonating God, or a bad prompt to LLM I guess.
Surprised G. Orwell or A. Huxley didn't think of it first.
Or the user can compile a version that predates "age verification"
They want to kill those bills so that their laws that they passed in TN and TX are expanded and they make more money.
I don't really like either solution, but I definitely don't want to help the companies that want to keep a copy of my ID and face scan.