15 comments

[ 5.1 ms ] story [ 37.2 ms ] thread
Can anyone tell me exactly what these laws do? Is it just going to ask for a birthday when I run `adduser`? What's the point? Is it meant for one admin account to restrict other user accounts?
I guess this can potentially make it easy for the overzealous lawmakers & individuals harass those os/distributions to introduce age verification.

I prefer a satirical 'ShouldItAgeVerify' page that points the ridiculousness of shoving verification at unexpected places.

The omarchy statement is just DHH dropping the r-word in a DM.

I love omarchy, but manchild/edgelord behaviour from the lead doesn’t exactly instill confidence.

what if a distro uses systemd and systemd implements age verification?
I... Kinda think this will work out ok? Hear me out: Linux is open source. Someone's gonna make an application/kernelmodule that lets you configure your reported age on a application/website basis.

In some jurisdictions it's illegal to target kids with advertisement, and I believe also to track them? Reporting your age as 8-12 is gonna be the new, but actually functional "no tracking" header.

The browser needs to actually read this for it to be meaningful. Where is that list?
So once an OS has your age then what it is just handed out to sites so they can target children for better kidnapping?
lol, why not just createa law and state that "people must be happy, environment must be good, everyone must get along with everyone, also no wars".

Law doesn't work like this.

This is not law, this is impersonating God, or a bad prompt to LLM I guess.

Age verification is simple! A Kelvar strap must be attached to the user before the device will power up. A probe in the strap takes a drop of blood from the user and analyzes the protein markers to determine the user's age. (See the Stanford U. study for details.)

Surprised G. Orwell or A. Huxley didn't think of it first.

I read some of the Ubuntu thread about potential implementations and it sure made me pine for some rose tinted good old days when AccountsServices, xdg-portals, dbus, systemd-login, et al. weren’t things one had to know or care about. Everything seems so complicated these days.
If it's open source then the user can remove "age verification" before compiling

Or the user can compile a version that predates "age verification"

Be careful, you open yourselves up to be used by companies like iDenfy, AgeChecker.Net, IDscan.net, and others as they would HATE to see a local-first solution like what's been proposed in CA and IL to take hold.

They want to kill those bills so that their laws that they passed in TN and TX are expanded and they make more money.

I don't really like either solution, but I definitely don't want to help the companies that want to keep a copy of my ID and face scan.

artix linux is a joy to use