Ask HN: Should we collectively stop spell checking and fixing grammar
I know this sounds strange, and this could have been a reddit post, but I have realized ever since I went back to not rewriting things for polish using AI.
I have had more positive feedback from the community and any personal/professional email.
people prefer reading short emails which doesn't have to be confusing.
people dont wanna read AI slop. It sounds nice sure, but lately no one cares about the english language being nice
everyone just wants to have a conversation/discussion with an actual human.
I personally am gonna just stop fixing grammar, and not care about it!
Thanks for listening to my rant. Written by a human, who's still in college, and might not get a job. :/ crying in the corner
17 comments
[ 2.3 ms ] story [ 49.9 ms ] thread(2) it's ok to ask "is this grammatical?"
(3) I will bounce ideas off chatbots but I think I've used just once AI generated sentence in the last two years. On one hand it is not my voice and it also sticks out like a sore thumb. I mean, if I hear "you're not a fur, you're a therian" another time I'm going to howl at the moon or something.
It's the "reduction to the mean" that turns everything into bland corporate-friendly prose like the bulk of the corpus that AI models ingest.
It's not that hard to learn your own language. You presumably are using it constantly, every day. It should be a high priority to know how to spell the words you're using, IMO.
I do make occasional mistakes, but mostly from using the "swipe" keyboard on my phone, and failing to catch the mistake.
I don't proofread things like text messages or forum posts--only important emails, or documents that will be posted publicly at my business, and therefore reflect on me.
If I'm not sure about a word I'm using, I either look it up, or rephrase to use words I'm more familiar with.
So I would recommend learning to spell check and proof read your writing, because you want to be able to write with intent.
You can very well use AI to just fix your spells and grammars instead of asking it to generate something entirely from scratch.
On the contrary, someone can still ask AI to make a few grammatical errors or spelling mistakes so it "looks like" it's human written? I don't think we should go there.
When I’m listening to a presentation or YouTube video, or reading an article or email, and certain AI phrases are used, I’m done. It’s such a turn off.
I’ve started reporting YouTube videos that were obviously written by AI. When someone at work gets up to do a presentation and they start using AI style transitions in their speech, I’m dropping from the call. I don’t need anyone to read their AI results to me. That seems like a colossal waste of time. That person is telling me that they can and should be replaced by AI, because they’ve just publicly shown using AI is all they bring to the table, which isn’t something anyone should want to convey to a large group of people at work.