I'm laughing so hard at the video, I imagine this is what browsing the web is like for the elderly that barely know how to use a computer. Can someone do this in Chrome?
There was also a nice dramatic arc to it, with the browser first (seemingly) behaving normally, then starting with a few scattered theme switches, then going increasingly off the rails as more and more extensions start up.
> I did some research to find why this took so long. 13 years ago, extensions.json used to be extensions.sqlite. Nowadays, extensions.json is serialized and rewritten in full on every write debounced to 20 ms, which works fine for 15 extensions but not 84,194.
"In terms of implementation, the most interesting one is “Іron Wаllеt” (the I, a, and e are Cyrillic). Three seconds after install, it fetches the phishing page’s URL from the first record of a NocoDB spreadsheet and opens it [...] The API key had write access, so I wiped the spreadsheet."
> Dr. B is the king of slop, with 84 extensions published, all of them vibe coded.
> How do I know? Most of their extensions has a README.md in them describing their process of getting these through addon review, and mention Grok 3. Also, not a single one of them have icons or screenshots.
> Personally, I’m shocked this number is this low. I expected to see some developers with hundreds!
This is really surprising. Either because Firefox is not that popular ir mozilla has an automatic filter?
Seeing this article, and how much webextensions manage to mess up the browser, I'm wondering how bad this experiment would've been with the legacy XUL extensions. Maybe they had a point in getting rid of them...
The eternal tension between "this service mesh is completely overengineered for our usecase" and "our broker is far to slow for our 84.205 microservices"...
40 comments
[ 2.4 ms ] story [ 51.6 ms ] threadAlso the metal pipe.
The icing on the cake is the discovery of a potential performance bug in one or more of the about: pages, that's definitely worthy of following up.
I geel this on a deep personal level.
On addons.mozilla.org, but you can distribute Firefox extensions without posting on addons.mozilla.org. I do.
Occasionally, databases are useful. ;)
https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fz...
https://fergido.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/too...
> We turned on crash reporting on the way.
I haven't burst out laughing like this in a while! You'll probably make for some horror stories to a poor Mozilla team.
Chrome Web Store has something similar: https://chromewebstore.google.com/sitemap
And Edge: https://microsoftedge.microsoft.com/sitemap.xml
I quickly wrote up how: https://www.arnevogel.com/firefox-permissions/
Yet Dr.B extension keep balooning and getting crazier day by day!
Now as I write this, it has 97 extensions from prior 84 extension
Man, how many slop will he keep putting out there.
This is really surprising. Either because Firefox is not that popular ir mozilla has an automatic filter?
[1]: https://www.letsgameitout.tv/
Better to organize it into main findings and side stories.
Every Internet café had at least 2, with Ask.com, Google, Yahoo and later on, Bing being the main contenders.