Does this strike anyone as bad api design to anyone else? I don't know what their definition of "much" is and it may not be the same as mine. behind the scenes they must have a real number like page_visits_in_last_30_days, which they're checking against a threshold value or "much". It'd be much more useful to just go ahead and return page_visits_in_last_30_days.
(to be fair, maybe the api does offer this too and it's just not the focus of the article)
I didn't realize the images are dynamic and when I went back to look at one that I thought would make a perfect phone lock screen it was gone. Luckily, I remember the name. Here it is, in case anyone is interested: https://www.artic.edu/artworks/79175/honorable-mr-cat
2 comments
[ 4.9 ms ] story [ 19.6 ms ] thread(to be fair, maybe the api does offer this too and it's just not the focus of the article)
I didn't realize the images are dynamic and when I went back to look at one that I thought would make a perfect phone lock screen it was gone. Luckily, I remember the name. Here it is, in case anyone is interested: https://www.artic.edu/artworks/79175/honorable-mr-cat