15 comments

[ 4.1 ms ] story [ 32.2 ms ] thread
By Trump's personalist DoJ. Presuming good faith on the part of Trump admin feds is a journalistic mistake.
Todd Blanche, Trump's personal lawyer, digs the DoJ deeper into irreversible reputational debt.
SPLC activities: "...including filing litigation on voting rights and prisoner rights."

I can imagine these actions would be inconvenient for the Trump administration.

I imagine if they were committing fraud, that indeed would be convenient for the Trump Admin… it is also entirely unrelated if the fraud has taken place.
I predict that a settlement includes the following demands:

SPLC destroy all information it has about the Fred Trump lawsuit. Especially the records of Fred Trump arrested for punching a cop during a KKK rally in Queens.

Proud Boys, Oath Keepers etc. removed from the database as Jan 6 is rewritten.

And the grand jury testimony likely includes discussion about why SPLC shell companies are fraud but other shell companies are respectable. I predict this testimony was immediately sealed.

They were paying KKK members and Nazis. The scam was roughly the same as firemen paying arsonists to justify their salaries.
"In 2014, F-9 entered the headquarters of a violent extremist group and stole 25 boxes of their documents. F-9 coordinated payment for the copying of the materials with a high-level SPLC employee who had knowledge the documents had been stolen."

You are defending the KKK.

“The SPLC was not dismantling the groups,” Blanche said. “It was instead manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred.”

There was always something suspicious about the SPLC, almost like a big brother of the ADL. Both organizations profit greatly from the very thing they supposedly fight. Why dismantle something when you can turn it into a cash cow?

The past decade has been a real eye opener for me. It pays to critique absolutely everything, especially those deemed above reproach.

There are less than 4,000 neo-Nazis in the US, and less than 8,000 KKK members. 12,000 equates to just 0.0035% of the U.S. population, the same number as people who suffer from dwarfism.

Combined, the SPLC and ADL are worth about a billion dollars.

Read the lawdork piece. And read the 990s from the organizations to see where the money goes.

It pays not to be bamboozled by bad faith actors like Todd Blanche.

I guess we might see as the case actually starts up, but I tend towards this basic posture:

> Infiltrating hate groups with informants is something that goes way back to the civil rights era and before. It's never been something only the government can do, especially when the government is more likely to be showing up for the white power happy hour every third Thursday at Chili's.

https://bsky.app/profile/andycraig.bsky.social/post/3mjzzezd...

And to be extremely skeptical of this administration working in good faith. The lawfare to destroy the good, to destroy institutions, by the very worst, is just out of control. The expression of power of the rich to destroy has gone up and up and up, and they keep getting by even as they destroy load bearing elements of society:

> I will say, frivolously suing a nonprofit for fraud has become A Thing recently. See, e.g., James Huntsman's suit against the Mormon Church or Elon Musk's against OpenAI.

> But rich people wasting money to punish nonprofits they no longer like is one thing;* the government doing it is another.

https://bsky.app/profile/smbrnsn.bsky.social/post/3mk224wrzm...

The FBI had been paying the SPLC to do just this sort of thing, until the new extremist administration stepped in. The people waging this case know all that. The donors new the work the SPLC did. And it's quite clear they can't be expected to show receipts, and safely show where all the money goes. https://bsky.app/profile/tomjoscelyn.bsky.social/post/3mk25s...

More despicable illegitemate mis-governance as usual by the most chaotic evil US government we have ever had.

Yes this is lawfare. They paid people to infiltrate. That’s exactly what going undercover is, and we don’t have any problems with that.

This is them applying a bias against an institution they don’t like by framing it as fraud and abuse (while they ransack the country at levels 100x larger)