18 comments

[ 3.6 ms ] story [ 74.7 ms ] thread
Pretty cool. Would be nice to have the equation system as well in a recap, and the math not collapsed by default. Also had to look up other resources to understad that time correction refers to correcting a relatively short window of time, as it was not clear that receiver clock is actually accurate enough for short periods (milliseconds) to treat as affine.

So the trick, as always, boils down to engineering approximations, haha.

Very cool to see these browser-native interactive 3D visualizations! Gives this such a different energy than a regular blog post would have had.

I'm guessing those visualizations wouldn't be in this post if it weren't for AI. The interesting question is what happens when ed-tech ships this pattern at scale. Exciting future.

Always makes me laugh when you get some dimwit that claims the Earth is flat, but then uses Google maps in his car. Magic!

GPS are amazing. If you understand how they work, and how they reliably know the time etc. you'd think you live in the future; and yet it's everywhere, in our pockets.

Page tries to load, then goes:

404 Page not found

Sorry, we couldn’t find the page you’re looking for

It gets even more interesting if you take into account how the satellites know where they are. Around the world there are fundamental stations: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_station

I had the opportunity to visit one. Basically they measure their own position in relation to each other. They do that with Very-long-baseline interferometry, basically what is the time difference of quasar radio signals hitting their Radio telescopes. The things they account for is wild like local gravity field a couple of super prices atomic clocks etc. they then laser range find Satellites (all not only gps) which is a „fun“ summer student job at least at the one that I visited.

Cool article. Did a very good job explaining things simply and providing good diagrams.
And then you try to actually build a GPS network, and ask yourself: what kind of antennas should we use? what should be the freq? how much power? how will the receiver detect the precise nanosecond when it receives an incredible weak signal? (in current GPS the signal is bellow thermal noise)
You can go into a really deep rabbit hole thinking about those questions.. this page explains the design decisions behind LunaNet AFS navigation signal: https://insidegnss.com/the-augmented-forward-signal-afs-defi...

Some considerations:

- They don't use GPS frequencies because there is receiver on the moon that receives GPS L1 signals (LuGRE and potentially more in the future)

- Make it easy to acquire for low complexity hardware

- Use 5G forward error correction code to reuse existing hardware implementation

- Design the signal in a way so that the user can easily find start of a data frame

And those are RF level considerations... there will be more considerations needed for the data transmitted over those navigation signal that the receivers need to use to determine navigation satellite position as lunar orbit is much more complicated than Earth orbit

What's interesting is the Chinese GPS called BeiDou is way more advanced than the now outdated American GPS system

Except BeiDou is banned on American devices unlike Russian GLONASS

Even though GPS is a read-only service and could not affect civilian devices and it's already built-in to most phone/watch chipsets

Biden admin tried to change policy but ran out of time

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47849174

It will radically increase accuracy and availability the day it's allowed (like in Europe)

Triangulation.

Saved you a click.

The time part reminded me of the old WWVB radio time signals.

If/when that goes away, I wonder if it will be cheaper to use a gps chip to make "self setting" clocks, or if everything will just be wifi connected.

(comment deleted)