This was an interesting interview. Like a lot of great comedians, Odenkirk has a very grounded and bleak view of the world. I suppose a lot of art, comedy included, is a way of coping with their perspective, for themselves and for the audience.
I think it's less about comedy being the outlet to "cope" with what you see, and more about seeing the comedy because you are able to see the world for what it really is.
Most of timeless comedy simply describes the mundane reality of the audience in a way that they realize the absurdity of it.
A lot of comedians, ie standup ones but not only, have had hard lives, suffer from depression, anxieties and so on. The better the ones the more (ie Robin Williams). Making people laugh is their coping, validation and approval mechanism for the world and life.
Such people have different perspectives on life, success and happiness, for better or worse.
> Like a lot of great comedians, Odenkirk has a very grounded and bleak view of the world. I suppose a lot of art, comedy included, is a way of coping with their perspective, for themselves and for the audience.
IIRC, I've heard it said that comedians are not happy people and usually had pretty difficult childhoods where "being funny" was a coping mechanism.
13 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 33.2 ms ] threadMost of timeless comedy simply describes the mundane reality of the audience in a way that they realize the absurdity of it.
Such people have different perspectives on life, success and happiness, for better or worse.
IIRC, I've heard it said that comedians are not happy people and usually had pretty difficult childhoods where "being funny" was a coping mechanism.
[article authors don't write these headlines, you guys - let alone interview subjects]
yea yea we get it
Interesting, I wonder how common this is and how the interviewees feel about it.