25 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 46.8 ms ] thread
Looks interesting and fun, but in no instance of any C compiler I've come across is the "classic example" of "hello, world" using `fprintf(stderr, ...)`

To each their own I guess.

Give io buffering an inch and it will take a mile
I give you `if (0 > fdprintf (STDERR_FILENO, ...))` instead.

But on a serious matter, it's a good thing to tell a beginner that diagnostics belong on stderr, not stdout.

The real classic is from The C Programming Language (where I saw it) and is:

main( ) { printf("hello, world"); }

(comment deleted)
Did you use Codex 5.4 for the web design? :p I think Codex tends to do very similar designs, could be completely mistaken tho
The source for the site is here: https://github.com/dyne/cjit/tree/main/docs. It's a VitePress site with a custom theme. Glancing through the code, I don't see any obvious signs of LLM coding. It also definitely wasn't created with Codex specifically, because according to the commit history, the first version of the site was in late 2024, months before Codex even released.
Sweet project! I will give this a go today :)
> inspired by HolyC by Terry Davis

Definitely was not expecting this reference.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TempleOS#HolyC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_A._Davis

I’m not surprised by it, but I am confused as I do not see anything that reminds me of TempleOS, HolyC, or Davis. If anything, this is just pushing the tcc —run functionality one step further.
The site visually feels "compressed" due to the font used? It's a bit jarring. The tutorial link in the header nav doesn't go anywhere.
Cool idea.

I was wondering why the release explicitly is `cjit-x86_64-ubuntu-24.04` instead of generic linux, but it does in fact appear to not work on Arch:

`tcc: error: file '/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1' not found`

I'm guessing that's due to a `dlopen` since it's not listed by `ldd`

The TUI demos work great, but I couldn't get the SDL examples to resolve all the missing symbols after trying for a bit.

Inspired by Terry. But does it glow?
> CJIT is not a tracing or adaptive JIT in the VM sense. It does not interpret first and optimize hot paths later.

> CJIT uses TinyCC to compile C quickly, often in memory, and can execute the resulting code immediately.

Wait, what's the difference between this and just using tinycc directly?

   cat program.c | tcc -run -
Happy to be proven wrong here, since the project has been around for a couple years. It doesn't appear to just be a random AI one-shot thing.
> inspired by HolyC by Terry Davis

...in what way? o.O

> What's different between tcc -run and CJIT? >The main difference is in usability.

> CJIT improves three main UX aspects for now:

> It works as a single executable file which embeds the TinyCC compiler, all its headers and its standard library. This way there is no need to install anything system wide, check paths and setup build folders.

> It supports adding multiple files into one execution: can accept wildcards to ingest anything that is a C source, a pre-compiled object or a shared library. The symbols exported by each file will be visible to all during the same execution.

> It finds automatically common system libraries for each target platform, avoiding the need to repeat these settings and look for the right paths.

I wonder whether CJiT can compile itself a-la GCC and LLVM. FAQs don't mention this and maybe the next weekend I will try to boot cjit with cjit itself.
You should release a static version of it.