Nice concept. But I would like if you could display much more far back. And perhaps also how much upvotes each one got. Look at hneasy.com and maybe contact him.
Thanks for the feedback! It's actually creating its own database so as time goes on, it will show everything since it's been running. I didn't want to scrape through the backlog as I've already gotten banned a couple times while making this (prompting pg's recent unban post) and I didn't want to push my luck.
The upvotes thing is tricky because it's very time sensitive. I thought about it for a bit, but besides the difficulty in judging when to update the points, it also goes against the goal that all Show HNs are given the spotlight even if they didn't do so well.
Don't know how you're scraping this...but why not just keep track of the current upvote totals everytime you crawl the list (up to a certain cutoff point...I don't think upvotes more than three weeks from now really mean anything)...It's nice to see all the Show HN's in one place, but if some of them were flops, then they won't be more interesting when viewed from this app. However, I think it is always useful to see what great Show HN's we might have missed in the week or month...not all of us check the frontpage every day or mark down all the things we wish we had time to visit later.
Can't believe no one has complained about the font-weight/font-color being eye-straining...was HN down or something the past hour? :)
Rather than just a list, it'd be great (as someone else pointed out) to show upvote score. And then a way to show most upvoted in past week/month/year/all-time, as that is a view that is not-at-all easy to get from HN's interface.
The site is still virtually unreadable for me. In case you're seeing something different, I'm at work on Windows 7 with Chrome. I wear glasses. I pretty much cannot read the smaller text. That is to say, I can do it, but it physically hurts a bit. Screenshot: http://imgur.com/h9wNl
It's worse than just contrast. The text is so thin, light, and small, that parts of the glyphs can't even be rendered. There are literally not enough pixels to draw the open area of the top half of an "e" in the usernames below the titles.
Part of it is Chrome's messed up subpixel antialiasing (for which I've had an open bug report since September when they broke it), part is just making text way too small for anything but a 30" Retina display, if that exists.
I've upped all the sizes so hopefully it's a bit better now. I had only tested it on an old Macbook and a Nexus 7, where the original font, size, and color were all very readable to me. Thanks for the heads up.
Can you read this well? Is this just a fad that everyone is getting on, or is there a legitimate reason for having a gray background with a slightly darker gray text color?
Short of that, cool site. It'd be nice to see how many comments are on a submission, and if clicking 'comments' didn't load a new tab.
> Can't believe no one has complained about the font-weight/font-color being eye-straining
Thank you for posting this.
I've pretty much given up mentioning it.
Designers tend to have good eyes, and excellent calibrated monitors. Most people don't have such good monitors. Some people even have really cheap lousy tn panels with smudges and smears and such all over.
I'd be interested to know what everyone thinks is a good size and what good colours are.
I like massive fonts - make it big enough so you think it's too big, and then make it a bit bigger. And I like a pale off white background with black or very dark text. (Something #ffffdd and #003300)
> Designers tend to have good eyes, and excellent calibrated monitors. Most people don't have such good monitors. Some people even have really cheap lousy tn panels with smudges and smears and such all over.
Here's an idea for a service: something that would simulate how given thing looks on different cheap, poorly calibrated monitors and TV screens.
It's more than that. Designers tend to use Macs. OS X's Quartz font engine renders text more heavily (and wider) than Windows' or Linux's does, and Chrome on Windows in particular suffers because it uses GDI for font rendering rather than DirectWrite like IE and Firefox do.
Chrome on Windows also happens to be the single largest web browser demographic, making it particularly hilarious that designers on their Macs end up designing these websites with utterly illegible fonts.
Arial and Helvetica may not be cool, but they're readable.
I made http://www.hnshowcase.com that shows thumbnail/comment count/vote count of all "Show HN" posts. You can sort by comment and vote count but right now it doesn't let you filter by time range. I think I'll look into adding that to the next version.
I agree to some extent (on this particular page the contrast is far too low). But low contrast has some benefits too--specifically, reduced eyestrain. On most sites, high contrast is fine, but if something is meant to be read--blogs, articles, code, etc.-- I much prefer a more subdued colorscheme.
It seems good, as others have stated it is a bit low contrast.
I just have one small problem with the header/title. Right now it's click able on the whitespace surrounding the title. I've outlined this http://i.imgur.com/isRbJ.png
The red box is where it's click able now, and the green box is where I think it should be click able.
42 comments
[ 2.7 ms ] story [ 102 ms ] threadThe upvotes thing is tricky because it's very time sensitive. I thought about it for a bit, but besides the difficulty in judging when to update the points, it also goes against the goal that all Show HNs are given the spotlight even if they didn't do so well.
knocked over by all the meta in hnshowcase showing showinghn showing Show HNs while showing other Show HNs
Rather than just a list, it'd be great (as someone else pointed out) to show upvote score. And then a way to show most upvoted in past week/month/year/all-time, as that is a view that is not-at-all easy to get from HN's interface.
My scraper isn't currently set to get that deep, but the most upvoted per time period is a good idea that I'll look into.
http://i.imgur.com/mnuFK.png
Part of it is Chrome's messed up subpixel antialiasing (for which I've had an open bug report since September when they broke it), part is just making text way too small for anything but a 30" Retina display, if that exists.
Short of that, cool site. It'd be nice to see how many comments are on a submission, and if clicking 'comments' didn't load a new tab.
Thank you for posting this.
I've pretty much given up mentioning it.
Designers tend to have good eyes, and excellent calibrated monitors. Most people don't have such good monitors. Some people even have really cheap lousy tn panels with smudges and smears and such all over.
I'd be interested to know what everyone thinks is a good size and what good colours are.
I like massive fonts - make it big enough so you think it's too big, and then make it a bit bigger. And I like a pale off white background with black or very dark text. (Something #ffffdd and #003300)
I'm using plugins at the moment to fix stuff.
Here's an idea for a service: something that would simulate how given thing looks on different cheap, poorly calibrated monitors and TV screens.
Chrome on Windows also happens to be the single largest web browser demographic, making it particularly hilarious that designers on their Macs end up designing these websites with utterly illegible fonts.
Arial and Helvetica may not be cool, but they're readable.
Here's Chrome 25 on Windows: http://cl.ly/image/000u2i2C0S3Q
And here's Chrome 24 on OS X: http://cl.ly/image/0t132S3b3k0d/o
Here is some feedback:
- I second the opinions that the text is a bit unreadable.
- A lot of white space especially at the head of the page. On 1366x768 the first post is almost in the middle of the page.
- Would be great to have more posts. Paging would work.
Additional features you may consider:
- Maybe a screenshot of the page would make your site less plain. Checkout html2canvas http://html2canvas.hertzen.com/
Great stuff :)
If anyone knows a good replacement show HN feed I could add to http://skimfeed.com let me know!
This is the perfect job for Pipes. It's literally the only Yahoo service I still use, but it's awesome. I wish I could write my own modules, though.
I just have one small problem with the header/title. Right now it's click able on the whitespace surrounding the title. I've outlined this http://i.imgur.com/isRbJ.png
The red box is where it's click able now, and the green box is where I think it should be click able.