8 comments

[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 24.8 ms ] thread
> Full disclosure: I’m a co-founder of Kelviq.

So this is an ad. Fine, but that ought to have been disclosed at the beginning.

You probably made that money because you sell some other product on side and bundled the library license in.
One thing I mention to folks that seem to think AGPL "protects you" against a major corporation incorporating your product into a SaaS product: it mostly doesn't.

It isn't written about often, but it's the reason many "open core" companies moved away from AGPL to protect their revenue from larger SaaS/IaaS/PaaS players from eating their lunch.

Some writings are:

- https://writing.kemitchell.com/2021/01/24/Reading-AGPL

- https://katedowninglaw.com/2019/09/08/the-great-open-source-...

- https://drewdevault.com/blog/Anti-AGPL-propaganda/

What’s dual licensing i’m kinda interested
(comment deleted)
This is what Tailwind should’ve done. It’s a shame to see hard work contribute countless millions of dollars to publicly traded companies and highly capitalized startups, and OSS creators not getting their due.
Thanks for sharing!