Ask HN: Is the next big thing locally running coding agents?
There's extreme price escalation on part of Anthropic, with token spend now approaching levels that have made many-an-enterprise scratch their heads.
At the same time, judging by opensource advances (E.g. Qwen 3.6 27B), hosting a smart enough local LLM on 16GB VRAM (or equivalent) is increasingly becoming a reality. Lastly, I see most coding to be of intermediate difficulty, not beyond.
Seems to me it's a matter of time that people shift to free Claude Code type experiences, powered by local LLMs.
What do you think?
9 comments
[ 2.6 ms ] story [ 28.7 ms ] threadIt went:
Needs more tweaking of the context window, I think.Seriously, I agree that this is the future, when OpenAI et al have gone bust.
I can take that for the joy of running this locally !
That being said I think an unpredictable variable here is how the companies building frontier models respond to what should be a noticeable inflection point in consumers turning towards locally hosted open weight models.
There is also a significant amount of compute that is being built out as we speak that should in theory reduce costs for providers of frontier models but that's a whole other can of worms.
Despite all of the very impressive open weight models that are available to us today, Anthropic and OpenAI continue to remain steps ahead of the competition. Most of the biggest and brightest minds in AI are working at frontier labs. It's not hard to foresee that these labs continue to maintain their edge given the amount of expertise and brainpower they've assembled.
Assuming frontier models continue to maintain their edge, even if it's on a subset of tasks (e.g. reasoning, judgment, planning), I see a convergence towards a hybrid workflow where both frontier and local models are used for specific tasks. e.g. Claude for reasoning, planning, judgment, with intelligent routing to cheap/free models tuned for certain tasks.
I've toyed with the idea of buying two rtx 6000s and vlinking them. But the cost benefit value prop doesn't really pan out quite yet, still cheaper to use open router / some subscription plan for open weights.
I'm looking forward to continued optimization from the open weights labs / models. Qwen and gemma4 are quite capable.
Also I feel what's really under utilized is a suite of llm/ai tools that are completely open and runnable locally.
Hunyuan 3d 2.0, trellis2, unirig
Flux 2 dev, z image, qwen image edit
Ltx 2.3 / wan
Ace step 1.5
All great for creation pipelines. Couple those with other smaller things like sam2 and dino. It's very exciting to see these things producing high quality on local systems.