Debatable but likely not insane: there MAY be an issue with SpaceX' hiring
OK, this is just social science but note this:
Musk posted today for people to give 3 proofs of exceptional ability if they want to join the most expensive and "most innovative" company ever - Spacex.
But how can you innovate when you follow the rules? what if you send 1, 2 or 4 reasons? and why would anyone work for someone with very questionable and controversial views? It doesn't seem possible for Spacex to revolutionize the world, change it: sure they do...for 20+ years but they fail to revolutionize for 20+ years. And the reasons are obvious.
7 comments
[ 7.5 ms ] story [ 36.1 ms ] threadPlease explain.
Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.
Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."
Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer...
Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples curiosity.
Please don't use uppercase for emphasis. Instead, put *asterisks* around it and it will get italicized.
We eventually have to ban accounts that keep posting like this, so please take a moment to read the guidelines and make an effort to observe them if you want to keep participating here.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
I asked you nicely to explain yourself and you copped out and said "they failed. Period" like a child instead of having an intellectual conversation.
I'm not sorry.