11 comments

[ 4.2 ms ] story [ 31.9 ms ] thread
the Claude-produced website alongside its excessive hyperbole makes me much less likely to believe this “expose”, even if there is an element of truth to it. if you want to call out a company for being “AI slop”, don’t vibe code a website to do so.

to be fair, the fact they show precise revenue data through their public API is interesting: https://polsia.com/api/public/live/dashboard

The company name is aislop in reverse. Because it reads like parody, it is likely parody. It would be sad if smart people on Hacker News fall for this, not to mention AI hating journalists and bloggers.

But let's give the VCs of the round the benefit of doubt, and hope the raise is tied to KPIs and long term value creation.

This has to be a parody, and I will believe that it is until somebody can provide evidence that it isn't.
Please for the love of god stop with the AI designed websites.

Hand-authored system default HTML with 5 lines of CSS for formatting would be just fine.

My eyes, my eyes! (closed the tab after 4 seconds)
https://polsia.com/live

Seems like you can ask Polsia about Polsia. The zero-arr.vercel.app AI investigative journalist interviewing Polsia could be this generation's Frost/Nixon.

if you feed it back any of the claims, it defends them pretty well

it doesn't deny any of the stats and cites none of it is secret as it's all published on the public dashboard

at the same time, churn is expected for such a company, doesn't mean it's not a real business, especially as AI gets better and margins improve... I think their business model is real

probably worth 30MM too since market is untapped, cost of user acquisition is much less than average profit per user and if one of the businesses actually takes off, they have 100% vendor lock-in and take 20% off the top