Microsoft's stance on zero day exploits is a dumpster fire of their own making (doublepulsar.com)

> Hang on.. proof of concept exploit creation and distribution for zero days is “criminal activity” now?

Publicly publishing an exploit is so obviously First Amendment-protected activity that it’s almost tempting to want a test case.

Those are some very bold legal threats considering their founder is an epstein associate.

>Hang on.. proof of concept exploit creation and distribution for zero days is “criminal activity” now?

This is what happens when you jump the gun and publish without doing any research. The author needs to lookup how the CFAA works. Now, yesterday, and a decade ago, you couldn't just drop some exploit and walk away rambling about your rights. Dumpster fire takes are everywhere online.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Fraud_and_Abuse_Act#C...

> Microsoft's stance on zero day exploits is a dumpster fire of their own making

The words "'s stance on zero day exploits" are unnecessary in the above sentence.

If you can't win the game, don't play by the rules.

[flagged]

Since Microsoft took over GitHub, everything went to shit.

GitHub, dead!

Windows, dead!

Xbox, dead!

Now security analysts blacklisted for disclosuring vulnerabilities.

Wait until the big players decide to ditch Microsoft altogether, I mean, why help when you are penalized for it??

With Microsoft doing so many things wrong, and users migrating to Linux because even Windows softwares have become evil, and security analysts jumping ship, let me tell ya, Copilot or even Mythos won't save you. AI is as good as the data it was trained on while humans adapt on the fly.