If there was anything missing from the average American’s economic wellbeing, it was the ability to create bespoke financial products to scalably make bets against informed professional traders while they sleep.
I don’t understand this constant fascination with having language models trade stocks. Language models are very useful tools but not aligned at all with generating alpha.
I was a fan of Robinhood's mission of democratizing finance and prioritizing UX for casual traders. They seem to jump on every hype train though, crypto, prediction markets, now agentic trading, whether it is ethical or not or good for their customers or not, and it seems like the distance between "democratizing finance" and "finding new suckers" is closing. Disappointing but not surprising.
There needs to be a ton of regulation of this eventually. this will not be a problem from a safety perspective today, but a smarter-than-human agent trained on long-horizon tasks should not be given access to influence the market unless this is done very carefully.
Cryptoscammers everywhere rubbing their hands together. There's so many ways this could go wrong. Everything from prompt injection, to being tricked in running a specific scammers setup, to which they can pump and dump specific stocks, and all sorts of other manmade horrors.
38 comments
[ 3.0 ms ] story [ 58.6 ms ] threadWill be waiting for the notice to say that 70% of users lose money to now 90% of users lose money.
Obviously how much the average user will profit / compile debt from this change is a lot more variable.
This feels like when everything became webified for no reason, or everyone added features like 3D TVs that were clearly not necessary.
> Oops, your in deep debt now.