It's not much of a rename, though. Lots of people call it Postgres anyways. Besides, most people don't know how to pronounce PostgreSQL anyways, whereas Postgres is easily pronounceable.
As mentioned, this page has been up for ages (I've actually read it previously). At this point its sort of pointless, it is normally referred to as 'Postgres' by people giving PG talks at conferences and such.
As mentioned, this page has been up for ages (I've actually read it previously). At this point its sort of pointless, it is normally referred to as 'Postgres' by people giving PG talks at conferences and such.http://www.readenews.com
13 comments
[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 41.9 ms ] threadI think it's a great decision.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=Postgres&acti...
The text is almost verbatim since it was written in 2008. The last discussion on this was 2007/2008, as I recall:
http://andyastor.blogspot.com/2007/08/postgresql-or-postgres...
I regret even bothering to write these two sentences.
As far as I know, the core team's position is that the product is called PostgreSQL, with Postgres being an acceptable alias.
If you ask me, this comic sums up the issue adequately: http://xkcd.com/747/
Alternatively, if you want to have a few laughs, check this out: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/File:05_-_Gabrielle_Roth_-_p...
pgsql
psql
postgre
In the end postgres might end up just as confusing as postgresql, and in favor of the current name, at least it is status quo.
It's a much better name, and it's the original name, and I hope some day it will be the only name.