9 comments

[ 0.26 ms ] story [ 31.8 ms ] thread
Not surprising if true. The industry is full of immoral douches who think they are above being regulated, so of course it's not surprising when they behave unethically.
I don't like to be glib but this is literally playing stupid games.
> a multi billion dollar casino with rules that can change and you have no option to legally fight it

Why is there no way to legally fight this? Is polymarket too de-centralized? Or incorporated in a jurisdiction where that's not feasible? Or are "you can't sue us" ToS actually enforceable here?

zero sympathy.

how did we went from being all vocally aware that HFT is a scam that we will never get into, to falling to the lowest denominations of scams just because you can be the patso?

It sounds like they were scammed, and I feel bad for them. But they probably don’t realize how funny this comment is.

> I supported Polymarket for years because I believed they represented crypto values.

FTFA:

> I supported Polymarket for years because I believed they represented crypto values. > > In fact, their platform is simply another bucketshop where if you bet too much, you're going to get cleaned.

Please, tell me more about these “crypto values”. Are they values like, “no regulations,” “rug pulls,” “funding ransomware”?

For the initial position, he has a case.

Then he kept playing a market that was already fully decided, when the only step left was to resolve the outcome. I believe the relevant adage here is "You can't cheat an honest man."

With that said, any trades after a market has concluded but before it is officially resolved should be voided. The market should close at the end of the time window (or the time of the resolving announcement, if that's the relevant trigger point).

All gambling is a scam. If you are expecting fairness in gambling you are engaged in magical thinking.