2 comments

[ 0.24 ms ] story [ 10.1 ms ] thread
I would assume this would set a precedent for the government to have early access to proprietary technology before it was ever released?
This from the party of "no interference with business".

It's obviously a means to take control of AI, because the security argument fails Bigly after the firing of top security experts in the government (who might have the "wrong" views" )

Something about free speech being free for me but not for you?