5 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 20.3 ms ] thread
Violence is a morally acceptable response to being oppressed and controlled; women were not given a fair stake in society, and therefore it would be unreasonable to expect them to be bound by its laws.
Violence against children being morally acceptable is an interesting take.
Is it though? If a ward of the state who is trying to drive a stolen car because they force him to bath at the flatshare he lifes at riots against the police arresting him, is that absolute answer a good fit to a gradient question? Or a expression of the problem?
Shout out to the best named feminist group of all time, W.I.T.C.H. The Women’s International Terrorist Conspiracy from Hell.