74 comments

[ 5.2 ms ] story [ 101 ms ] thread
Does Brave track or does Brave fork on this?
Why are people on HN still using Chrome? (or Edge, or Opera…)
It's fast. All websites work. I like how it handles tabs and tab groups. uBO Lite is good enough for me.
Because it works and I don't have any compelling issues that would cause me to switch. I switched to Brave a while back (cause built in ad blocking) and have been quite content with it.
This feels more like a gradual tightening of extension APIs under Manifest V3 than a sudden “kill switch.” uBlock isn’t going away, but its capabilities are definitely being reshaped...
I wonder what will Vivaldi do. They say that their built-in content blocker is "good enough" that you supposedly don't need uBO (I very much disagree) but they also keep MV2 extensions working to this day.
IMHO it's quite brave that a Google employee working in that area would let his real name be published, and an illuminating view of how they (don't) think.
People still using that POS? :)
Finally Firefox will get a 30% usage share!
Just remember that Google is essentially an advertising company and that they were always going to squeeze this opening closed as soon as they could get away with it.

I do fear for a future were even Firefox ends up caving in. Ladybird browser might be our only hope until something legal comes along to block functionality.

AdGuard MV3 works fine. Still switch to FF if you can, more diversity in the ecosystem benefits everyone.
uBo is the only reason I find browsing the web at all tolerable anymore. As a test I turned it off to view this article and almost crashed my browser with a dozen auto play video ads This would mean I would find the energy to get over anything that is holding me on chrome, like saved passwords etc.
I have been using UBlock Origin Lite on Chrome for a while, and while it's not perfect and needs a bit of manual tweaking here and there, it's been mostly good for me
uBlock Origin lite exists. And in couple years usage I see no difference from non lite version.
The only reason I use Chrome is because its dev tools are better, and for whatever reason, webgl wigs out on Ubuntu 26.04 in Firefox. It's mostly the lag issue though...
Yet another reason to also perform ad blocking at the network level (e.g. DNS). I’ve found AdGuard Home very easy to maintain. Using Firefox and Orion browsers too.
>from our experience, uBO Lite does not seem to be as good as the original non-Lite version

In what way? I've never noticed a difference.

uBlock Origin Lite gives an identical browsing experience, ad-free. What is all the fuss about?
I hope not, I switched from chrome to edge so I can continue using ublock origin.
Being the maintainer of such a big open-source application as Chrome used to grant dictatorial power: maintaining a fork represented too much work. It only happened in the most awful situations, such as Oracle acquiring OpenOffice.

But that was before LLM-driven development, I think that now the game has changed, and maybe Google hasn't got the leverage it thinks it has.

So, what's next? Will Chrome ship with hard coded DNS, so that DNS based adblockers will stop working as well? Where (and when) does my rights what to display on my devices end?
Totally not a monopoly on the browser space /s