7 comments

[ 4.4 ms ] story [ 27.6 ms ] thread
(comment deleted)
Oh yeah, maybe 15-20 years ago, i started by Linux journey with Kubuntu, just because i loved how KDE looked, much better than the alternatives.

Sadly it was not difficult to encounter a bug at that time, so i gave up on it quickly. I wonder if it is in better shape now?

All KDE after 2 and 3 is awful to use.

I remember running KDE 1 running flawlessly on 32mb of RAM having a better desktop experience than today...

> All KDE after 2 and 3 is awful to use.

Thank you for saying this! I agree. KDE 1.x was great. KDE 2.x was cluttered but it did the job; with a major rework, such as Corel LinuxOS and Xandros gave it, it was a good desktop.

https://www.linux.org.ru/images/9832/original.png

Xandros never managed to tame KDE 3. It released a tech preview, with a basically unmodified copy of KDE 3, and then stopped putting out new versions of the desktop OS.

KDE is the poster child for creeping featuritis: it has dozens and dozens of skins and app launchers and other relatively pointless chrome that does not extend its functionality.

And yet, over the major releases from 4 to 5 to 6, it has gradually lost useful features, such as tabbed title bars and window grouping; title bars on the side of windows (like in wm2 and wmx), or on the bottom; and panels that could span screens.

20 years ago, there was a parody of KDE versus GNOME:

https://koplowicz.com/content/kde-vs-gnome-2

Now, it feels to me like the roles are reversed.

> I remember running KDE 1 running flawlessly on 32mb of RAM having a better desktop experience than today...

Also agreed.

Nowadays I don't care about KDE, GNOME or XFCE. I just use cwm+uxterm+tmux or windowmaker+gnustep+gap for nice visuals.