5 comments

[ 1.1 ms ] story [ 30.2 ms ] thread
I am open to a GitHub alternative, but not from these guys lol

Also most of the things that would be good have little to do with LLMs. Generating a lot of code with LLMs still feels to me like it fits fine with normal PRs and PR review.

Is the site broken for me, or is there literally zero information on what this is besides the title of this HN post? I’ve never seen a waitlist for such little information
They announced it live on stage at their conference, apparently with no accompanying blog post.
This is very shady. How is this different from Github. Can you explains how this deals with the AI code generation at machine speed? Does human still in the loop of reviewing the AI slop?