6 comments

[ 7.3 ms ] story [ 48.2 ms ] thread
(comment deleted)
(comment deleted)
Nice to see a mature open-source Diskless Kafka impl. How does this compare to KIP-1150?
(comment deleted)
(comment deleted)
The main difference is the layer where diskless is introduced. KIP-1150 makes it a diskless topic path with a Batch Coordinator; AutoMQ tries to keep the existing Kafka broker/leader path and swap out the storage underneath.

That makes the designs feel quite different even though both end up using object/shared storage.