18 comments

[ 3.9 ms ] story [ 40.0 ms ] thread
I know in CA it is a violation of election law for an armed law enforcement officer to enter a vote center unless they are responding to an incident or there to vote.
The content of the post deemed by ICE to warrant ~~federal prosecution~~ crime-boss-style intimidation:

> BREAKING: The ICE agent who shot and killed Renee Good in broad daylight has been identified as Jonathan Ross by the Minnesota Star Tribune. I think today is a great day for Johnathan to be indicted!

If anyone is wondering, it would still be a good day : )

I wonder how far we are away from people being arrested for holding up blank pieces of paper.
This kind of intimidation sucks and I'd like to see individual officers who indulge in it lose their qualified immunity and be prosecuted for it.

But I'm at least grateful to live under a regime that needs to break its own laws to do this, and so such charges can be dismissed by courts that follow the law, even if they don't apply consequences to the offending officials. Compare that to the UK where more than 12k people were arrested for social media posts in 2023 alone and where it is fully permitted under the law with great discretion and supported by the courts.

It's a bit like "my husband is better than yours because he doesn't beat me as hard", but it's something.

> But I'm at least grateful to live under a regime that needs to break its own laws to do this

Actions speak louder than words.

He's a (translated) quote from a constitution; the country it is from has no qualms about breaking it. I am confident you, as a lover of freedom, would not wish to live there:

  Article 67. Citizens are guaranteed freedom of speech, the press, assembly, demonstration and association.
  The State shall guarantee the conditions for the free activities of democratic political parties and social organizations.
- https://archive.org/details/constitution_202002/page/n21/mod...
The US regime's effort to avoid any culpability for killing American citizens is very concerning.
More broadly, across various instances, the administration and feds have been coming out strongly against basic freedom of speech which is a core constitutional pillar that defines America. It is highly unAmerican.

Meanwhile, the crook in charge keeps doing everything he can to keep his cronies rich, at the expense of the planet's climate. Those who voted for him continue to remain utterly uninformed of the tornadoes and floods they sow.

How is this anything other than a flagrant violation of her constitutional right to free speech? This is the government suppressing her speaking the name of the executioner, which was already publicly published.

If I was her, I would be launching a multi-million dollar lawsuit against the government for a violation of constitutional rights.

(comment deleted)
[flagged]
"reasonable" is for a jury to decide.

in the context of being charged with a crime, his name should be released. just like everyone elses.

7 hours old and not flagged? Amazing.
She claims that the post with his name is the one that triggered the visit.
I remember the good ole days when the White House would coordinate with former employees that got jobs with SV companies in their "online safety" orgs and would just ban or shadowban people. Less legally suspect because it was action by private companies.
(comment deleted)
What happened to freedom of speech? Before you know it we won't have any freedom at all. They had no right to track her down. We can't let this continue, something has to be done.