9 comments

[ 0.23 ms ] story [ 26.0 ms ] thread
The judge in these cases, Reed O’Connor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas has a history of hard right decisions that are overturned on appeal. I don’t know what the options are for these protesters; but I imagine they stand a reasonable chance on appeal.
This title by Reason seems unreasonable. The man was convicted of "tampering with evidence". In other circumstances, it would have been perfectly legal for him to transport these pamphlets.

As it turns out, when someone (your wife) gets arrested and tells you to do "whatever you need to do" and "move whatever you need to move at the house", it is highly illegal to then proceed to do so.

[flagged]
No he did not. He got the sentence for hiding evidence. The article tries very hard to push an agenda.
Regardless of the legal justification, this is clearly a miscarriage of justice, and evidence of extremely unequal enforcement.
Yet Americans have a felon as a president. What a sad joke of a country it has become
Please read the comments in the Reason article. Autumn Billings has a track record of distorting the facts.

"Last Independence Day, several protesters were arrested following a demonstration that turned violent outside the Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Prairieland Detention Center."

This was not a spontaneous act. The Antifa folks set up a deadly ambush of federal officials.