Ask HN: Examples of AI taste?
Here's my example:
React.js was released in 2013 (before I started programming professionally, so I could be wrong about this). But taste is knowing that React is the "future" even when all the training data that AI would've had until at that point in time was with Angular, Backbone, jQuery, etc. So no AI would suggest React, purely because it's too new and not enough training data, right? But having "taste" is using React.js over what is recommended by AI?
===
What does this imply? Is it possible, that if modern/good AI existed in 2013, we would've never used React.js because many folks would just "vibe" Angular or Backbone?
Is it possible the next best framework or language or tool already exists, but it will never get the light of day because it's not part of the AI training data?
4 comments
[ 4.1 ms ] story [ 24.4 ms ] threadIf you prompt thoroughly (listing your priorities, values, and your own taste), then you’ll get better recommendations that don’t just regress to the mean.
I think it’s wrong to say AI doesn’t have taste; it’s more accurate to say it doesn’t match your own taste and it can be hard to get it to match because it’s intangible.
This is more evident with Claude Design than Claude Code, where it does incredibly dull and uninspiring designs and then writes little puff pieces about how “bold” and “edgy” they are. For some situations that is the correct design, but I found it difficult to get better results with additional prompting.
There is one thing to note tho, recently we have been seeing something called emergent behavior (behavior not anticipated by engineers, but displayed by AI regardless). Using that, some experiments have been able to solve crazy complex problems. Maybe, those type of experiments may lead to something like an Ai created framework (still very unlikely). Plus, given the money being spent behind AI, I doubt people will use the strongest AI to build frontend frameworks instead of doing something else.