15 comments

[ 3.4 ms ] story [ 14.4 ms ] thread
And here I was hoping they'd decided to support Linux on the Snapdragon X2 chips.
Nah they'd rather try to continue to force snapdragon on windows where no one actually cares about this and the experience is trash.

AArch64 is dead for Windows and client Linux, and the knife is in Qualcomm's hands.

Never trust Qualcomm in the linux space. It only leads to frustration. Somehow I've had to learn this lesson more than once because I'm not the smartest ARM addict.
Just upstream your drivers! Then you don't need Qualcomm Linux.... you just have Linux.
[dead]
It has now been decades since I used Eudora. I still feel I lost the best email client due to Qualcomm’s neglect
Recently, Qualcomm acquired Modular/Mojolang/Chris Lattner et. al..
(comment deleted)
Qualcomm are forever blacklisted in my environment, because of their fuckery with backdoors for the spook agencies which fund their research.

I will definitely not be touching their Linux variant for that reason. I simply don't trust the company, one bit. They are the American Huawei.

Ah yes, the qualcomm way. Rather than upstreaming things so it just works make a Qualcomm Linux, perhaps with NDA and laywer speak to sign off on to get access to anything at all, all to use their mediocre hardware.

Qualcomm you suck, upstream your drivers, make it open. Stop faffing about with closed proprietary junk. Somehow Intel, Tenstorrent, and AMD understand this but you don't. You aren't NVIDIA!

I was just about to complain about being locked into one kernel version, being at the mercy of a single vendor, but you said it so much better than I would have :) Thanks.
Yocto sounds like it makes me feel when I use it
Sure, it's not great, it's just better (for some tasks) then every tool it's competing with. Buildroot is simpler, but not as flexible, etc...