For what it is worth, your site has been blocked by the UK's national cyber security centre on my current connection:
This site may be associated with malicious activity or malware.
Access to this site has been blocked by the Protective DNS Service
Site: wtf.korridzy.com
Please contact your local Network Administrator or IT support if you require further assistance
Look up this site on Cloudflare Radar [1] for more information.
I do not think the NCSC blocks sites. I have never come across a site block ordered by them. Most blocks I see are by sites themselves blocking Uk visitors for GDPR or OSA reasons.
It’s only blocked for users that are using a particular Protected DNS service. It’s fairly unusual to block a domain just because it’s new, with no other negative signals. The PDNS being used here seems to be configured very strictly. It’s certainly not an all-UK block.
It’s quite possible I’ll do that with a new work-related task. I regularly run similar experiments for myself, so I decided to write about one of them.
I had a pretty rough experience with Fable today. At first, Claude showed a message that Fable was available again, but if I typed /model it showed the same "disabled" state for the export controls, so that was sloppy. After I got it working (I had to login again), I asked it to do a security audit of a server I've written, and it spent a few tokens and then "flagged" the request and downgraded to Opus 4.8. Amazing stuff Anthropic.
The US government has forced them to make the filters even stricter than they already were. It feels meaningfully worse than during its initial release.
Amazing stuff, Trump voters.
And amazing stuff to Amazon's CEO, who threw a tantrum on the basis of misinformation and created this whole mess and has how resulting in permanent government handicapping of American models. Genius move.
I don't like any of those people so I'm not disagreeing, but I feel like this is 100% on anthropic for their constant doom trolling. They're not trying to be "responsible", they just want to scare people and it worked.
Why not both? Tattling to the Feds about a competitor over something like this is a dick move, even by the nearly nonexistent ethical standards of Silicon Valley currently.
Same story here. Wanted to give Fable a spin, session got flagged mid-execution of the plan (some innocent react-native code), things fell back to Opus, and then my "current session" usage limit ran out. So I ended up with a partial and broken Fopus implementation.
Takeaways
Which model to use for generating architecture.
The simpler the decision you need to make, the more readily you can just take a proposal from Fable or GPT-5.5. And now that Fable is unavailable outside the US, the choice between Opus and GPT is far from obvious. As a quick default I'd lean toward GPT.
21 comments
[ 8.6 ms ] story [ 193 ms ] thread[1] https://radar.cloudflare.com/domains/domain/wtf.korridzy.com
I do not think the NCSC blocks sites. I have never come across a site block ordered by them. Most blocks I see are by sites themselves blocking Uk visitors for GDPR or OSA reasons.
Opus 4.8, GLM-5.2, Kimi K2.7, etc
The US government has forced them to make the filters even stricter than they already were. It feels meaningfully worse than during its initial release.
Amazing stuff, Trump voters.
And amazing stuff to Amazon's CEO, who threw a tantrum on the basis of misinformation and created this whole mess and has how resulting in permanent government handicapping of American models. Genius move.
The simpler the decision you need to make, the more readily you can just take a proposal from Fable or GPT-5.5. And now that Fable is unavailable outside the US, the choice between Opus and GPT is far from obvious. As a quick default I'd lean toward GPT.