205 comments

[ 2.8 ms ] story [ 115 ms ] thread
I won by just grinding and touching grass
sad reality of life
Sounds like someone who has never touched grass. ;-p
That's not cheating, that's the answer
Same.

And since I won with an age, company, and title that is literally me right now... Well, I'm not exactly sure what to do with it information but some internalization is in order.

I got into YC, immediately got a 6M offer from Google, sold and won.
Really fun project, but doesn't take ageism into account, it gets easier the further you get whereas it should get be getting harder in certain ways
like family/personal time balance... neglect, and you get a message your teenage daughter is pregnant or your son joined a gang. game chugs along...
only did grinding and side project. got acquired. if it were that simple..
Nice! Had a burnout, a kidney stone and was laid off before even hitting 25! Sounds about right.
RAT RACE · ACQUIRED sold the company at 25 · walked away with $7.36M · peak burnout 71%

That was fun. Side-projected spam, touched grass once, YC, Side-project one more time, launch, acquired.

RAT RACE #1 · ACQUIRED sold the company at 25 · walked away with $13.13M · peak burnout 93%

Same strategy, seems to be the winning one.

Now make it 10x more difficult for those not born in the US.
Maybe you haven't seen the state of things in the US lately...
Look at salaries for the other 95% of human population on levels.fyi - earning $100k at 25 years is incredible privilege.
9.6 mil acquisition cash out we are so back
Neat, but font choice makes it extremely hard to read the text on mobile. Even harder when it's under the CRT style screen effect.
RAT RACE #1 · ACQUIRED sold the company at 28 · walked away with $10.17M · peak burnout 100%
RAT RACE #1 · DECEASED* *dead at 25 · $164k unspent · the on-call rotation already updated
Form HR-1099-RAT · Exit Interview · economic status: locked in Permanent Underclass
My vesting cliff somehow hit after getting fired lol
I have a friend who got laid off and had that happen.
Game seems to be heavily weighted towards building side projects. If only you could build a single side project without raising any funds and get acquired for 10M with an 80% cut...
this is possible now with AI
In all seriousness, where are these stories? There are so many "entrepreneurs" vibing away, but who is getting paid? I feel like there should have been some decent exits by now but all I've found are a few lifestyle businesses and a lot of hucksters.

My experience: I feel like I could build a real product solo much more quickly than ever before, but the reality is my side-projects have been mostly futzing around with coding agents and related infrastructure - like building my own command proxy system for sandboxed agents to manage cloud infrastructure in controlled ways - building the builder who never builds. I see a lot of that on Twitter too.

from a business standpoint, PMF was never about the underlying software. It’s a developer’s wet dream to toil away in a garage toward some Technical ideal, and then have the world applaud their genius and shower them with money.

Now to be fair, there are windows of time where that really did happen for some few. As a craftsman developer, I have the same wet dream. The problem is I know it’s just a dream now that I’m older.

So what AI has done is condense the frame in which a developer can spend years toiling away in the belief that they just need to keep going. Now the feedback loop is more instantly connected to reality and the reality is most all this stuff nobody wants or needs. starting a business now is ironically about all the business bits and that’s just rather annoying for builders like the HN crowd, myself included. This is more cathartic than anything. What do I know about entrepreneurial success?

Something that I was hoping was that LLMs would make software development easy enough so that I could upskill in areas that determine entrepreneurial success. But I find that the quality of code from LLMs is low enough that I have to spend a lot of time doing QA (or manual coding).

But also you could write the god damn best software out there but if you can't convince people to open the web page or download the app then it goes nowhere. Absolutely nowhere.

Really? I did great just alternating between "grind" and "lay low". Retired with $4.8m at 25!
This seemed to work best.

Unexpected given what I know second-hand about the valley - which is to grind leetcode and keep job hopping.

[delayed]
it cannot be discussed or else it becomes the flow.
This works only until other people also feel that is the thing to do.
Many strategies have an early adopter advantage.
Sure. And some also have an early adopter disadvantage.
doesnt that mean your resume will be full of short jobs and you wont get hired anymore
I finished it the first time by just hitting "grind" until burnout got above 80% and then hitting "touch grass" until burnout got down below 30%, repeat until win. It actually feels like my current job.
I tested just "side project", 100% ignoring wor:

RAT RACE · ACQUIRED sold the company at 25 · walked away with $6.40M · peak burnout 82%

Trying to balance grind, touch grass and side project took me 20 years before retiring with 20'ish millions.

Well thats your problem, everyone knows you got to apply to YC to get funded
Yes, I really don't think that such a high fraction of people get purchased for fucking 15M after one year lol
No option for the rat to bite you, you get rabiz, sue and cash out?
RAT RACE · ACQUIRED sold the company at 30 · walked away with $14.98M · peak burnout 94%

did i win???

On the end screen, it shows "Shareholder value created" with some huge number.

I find this terrifying because it suggests that the people who built this game are more naive than I am... And this is a game about a cynical topic.

It reminds me of conspiracy theory narratives "No matter how bad you think it is, reality is worse."

The idea that the engineer is creating "shareholder value" is part of the conditioning. They're creating complexity and literally running a hamster wheel. Lighting fires and putting them out. They are lucky to have this job where you can get away with this kind of pure performative engineering. Seriously, Netflix looks exactly the same as it did years ago. Same with Facebook. The fact that everyone uses it has nothing to do with engineering and everything to do with attention monopolization.

Working for a bootstrapped startup; that's real value creation because there is enormous risk involved and no engineer wants to take that risk.

Working for FAANG is more like being appointed to the king's court. There's no value creation happening... And the line to be chosen is long. Being chosen is not based on skill or talent. Talent is abundant. It's a kind of lottery.

Or maybe it is just sarcasm.
Maybe. Probably. It's hard for me to perceive sarcasm these days. I'm becoming just like the neoliberals I used to criticize who gets triggered at the slightest thing haha.

It's like if someone made a joke about genocide. That's how certain topics make me feel. My brain refuses to process.

That said, I do think a lot of cynical engineers have a "Rat race" worldview and not the "Hamster wheel" one.

Also, the amount of money which is needed to retire in the game is huge! I'm not even expecting to reach that at retirement. The fact that someone believes they can get this in a few years of grinding reveals a very cushy worldview...

Your life would be more cushy if you didn't hang around in suboptimal jobs.
Why do you assume I have access to such opportunities? This whole argument rests on the idea that everyone has equal access to opportunities. Which is incorrect.

Firstly, it's trivial to prove that the hiring process is broken and discriminatory. Secondly, history is not an indication of future performance. Just because it's been working out for big tech over the past few decades, doesn't mean this will continue. Especially when you look at the socio-political environment today, the risk profile is incredibly high... For a vanishing return.

For me to become a millionaire through big tech, starting from today, the previous batch of tech bros would become billionaires... Hundreds of thousands billionaires? That's just not realistic.

I'm not sure what the run it back button is doing, but it consistently manages to cause a graphical bug where all of my open firefox windows fully grey out until I refocus on them. Never seen that before.
I love how mind said “the offer says it’s the beginning of a journey but it’s actually a wheel”
RAT RACE #1 · ACQUIRED sold the company at 27 · walked away with $13.32M · peak burnout 84%

Gotta go grind out some AI B2B Agentic project now...

The hard part for B2B is the sales not tech. You are better off wining and dining a sales guy as your co founder than doing more vibe coding.
I try to resist the urge to vibecode, but yes agree on sales
The hard part is even knowing what someone would pay for. I don't know if a sales guy knows that or not.
[delayed]
What does this have to do with my comment? You don't get to the "negotiating a price" part if you never knew what the customer might buy.
Maybe add a non-US-citizen mode where if you are ever unemployed for more than 2 cycles you lose, unless you already have a side project with enormous traction
US citizen and permanent resident are equivalent for the purposes of this...
Your second point is so bizarre. You're complaining hardworking immigrants make you look bad because you don't work as hard?
that's a very weird way to read it.

i hope your kids are not sewing shoes instead of getting an education.

Yes, exactly this. Migrant workers, under the threat of being deported if they don't work enough, obviously can be forced to accept much worse work conditions and work-life balance.
yes! this enslavement mode is exactly the idea of those driving current policies.
I don't care how I "look". If a company puts me on PIP because I worked hard for 40 hours instead of 80, so be it, I'll just take severance, leave, and relax for a while. I have the luxury of doing that, and I'll prioritize my health and family over a rat race. I do believe in working hard, but I also believe in family and having pursuits to live life for outside of work.

If you're in H1B at a FAANG, you unfortunately don't have that luxury, because if you don't work 80 you may be put into PIP and forced to uproot your entire family and destroy your kids' education if you can't nail another job within 60 days. And so in groups with both H1Bs and citizens/PRs, a lot of H1Bs will work harder, out of fear, not because they actually want to, and if there is a stank ranking system, the ones who don't fear will be the ones who get PIP more easily because they respect their bodies' limits.

I was just suggesting that the game can simulate both of these modes, the second being drastically harder.

That was fun! Although I was automatically retired, with $1.7M in net worth. That’s hardly enough, especially in California. Maybe the game should ask for a goal number before starting
Depends in which part of California
If you retire at 30 with $1.7M, you’d be getting about $45-$60k/year for the rest of your life

Maybe if you live by yourself, or have someone contributing a second income, and inflation doesn’t catch up with you

Just like real life: Alternate moments of grind with moments of "strategic disengagement" (touch grass)
Man, I hate that tech has just become money. Content like this perpetuates it.
... it always has been?

It's youthful exuberance that can pretend it was ever anything else.

No it hasn't. It wasn't until money got involved that anything computers were lucrative. Before there was Airbnb there was the Internet of Couchsurfing.org, where people did things for free out of the kindness of their hearts and for fun. That world is long gone, replaced by OnlyFans and Amazon, cos we all got rent to pay. IBM was the big evil and Apple was the upstart and free and open standards and open source were gonna change the world. They didn't, thru got taken advantage of by corporate forces. If an MBA proposed open source, give away your work for free, and we'll just figure out some magical way to pay you, you'd tell them to get fucked. But because it came out of MIT and a bunch of nerds, it sounded like a good idea.

The magical way to get paid turned out to be advertising, giving us Google and Facebook and their invasions of privacy. If, instead, we'd had a culture of paying people for their time and effort, and not a bunch of freeloaders, who knows how things would look today. Proprietary and locked down, perhaps. But also maybe not?

/rant.

If things were so good then, how did they lead to Now?
The other people, it's always the other people
Due to multipolar traps (large-scale, multi-agent versions of the Prisoner's Dilemma) i.e. when individuals in a competitive system are forced to take actions that benefit them in the short term, but degrade the system for everyone over time.
I like how retirement progress is tracked in a "freedom bar". I have heard that amount of money being described with a different f-word.
I think this would be a lot more fun if there were different "starting" charasteristics.

High starting money, but low tolerance for burnout. Poverty, but extremely high tolerance for burnout. Can't find a job debuff. Low skill, grifter, false promises, lie to win. (Rolling chance to end up in prison). High skill start, low tolerance for burnout. ADHD debuff. Picking the opposite option of what you want debuff.

Also advance game by 1 month instead of 3 months.

> Poverty, but extremely high tolerance for burnout.

Slanting toward the fantasy genre here.

poverty is an unbelievable motivator if weaponized