26 comments

[ 6.9 ms ] story [ 35.5 ms ] thread
A 20 year search leads to the discovery of the nitroplast, a nitrogen-fixing organelle hiding inside algae.
Kudos to the scientists everywhere that continue to explore the mysteries of nature
Since computational biology is all about simulation, do the chloroplast, the mitochondria, and now the nitro-last, have definitions that could be actively simulated ?
Practically speaking, while we could simulate them at a fairly approximate level, it wouldn't really tell us anything useful.
The plastid wiki might be germane.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plastid

It’s presumably named after Henry Bigelow (like several other things in oceanography), so my guess would be /bɪɡəˈlə͡ʊwi.a͡ɪ/.
Yes, but based on parent's comment, they will now live forever in my head as Biggie-Lowies.
This is a nicely written article, which feels like a rarity lately.
was just thinking the same: it's so refreshingly well written (!)
it's a new model, human-sol-ultra, highly advisable to use in loops.
It’s a cool model but the training is so slow it feels like years!
Fantastic - the nitroplast joining a pretty exclusive club there.

Bigelowii itself seems very interesting, even without this nitrogen fixing organelle, having two completely different phases to it's life - one in a weird dodecahedral calcareous shell and one without as a mobile flagellate. Apparently it can exist and reproduce in either form, and occasionally switch forms. It took scientists a long while to realize the two forms are actually the same species.

CO2, you say? Human activity produces tens of percent of the bioavailable nitrogen.
Comparing it to CO2 is facile, the problem there involves the equilibrium level (or lack thereof) between the flows of what is emitted to the pool versus removed.

Excess levels of bio-available nitrogen are unlikely to build up when there a huge and only-half-metaphorical appetite for consuming it and turning it back into N2 gas.

(comment deleted)
I'm skeptical of the "magic noodles" bit as mentioned in the article.

The "tokoroten" noodles are just agar.

Pretty much everyone in biology tries growing cells in agar, right? Surely that can't have been an amazing discovery?

Maybe there is something else in Gelidium amansii that it needs, if the tokoroten was produced in the traditional way?
I've had cells growing fine in 20 L Cytiva wave bags and then fail to grow in 20 L Sartorius wave bags. Anyone that tells you they know how a cell grows is lying to themselves :)
I got chills reading this. The last time I felt this way was reading "Project Hail Mary" and that was for a fictional cell!

It's crazy to me that we are still discovering these microscopic yet crucial parts of nature around us.

Azolla which at one point maybe caused an iceage is freshwater only and a symbiotic organism with a cyanobacteria, and the bacteria can't tolerate salt, maybe there is something cool we could do with nitroplasts to improve sea vegetation to reduce CO2
> The only organisms that can actually pull this off are ones that can get by without oxygen: super simple bacteria and archaea. That means the entire natural world relies on a relatively small number of microscopic species to make nitrogen usable by more complex forms of life.

I remember reading that this was a significant factor in why people were so alarmed over DDT. It had not been anticipated how widely it would spread beyond the places it was intentionally used and how it would persist. It ended up in almost all ecosystems, full of life it had never been tested on.

If it had turned out to kill many of those small number of microscopic species that almost all plant and animal life relies on we could have been royally screwed.

That obviously turned out not to be the case with DDT, but it made people realize that we had to be a lot more careful when designing and testing pesticides than we had been.