18 comments

[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 44.0 ms ] thread
Wikipedia is still on the Ofcom watchlist and might be designated Category 1 at some point.
In other words, "stay where you are for now, we promise to extend the legislation to cover you in the future".
They just know they can't afford the power right now to do it. They would if they thought they could get away with it.
Governments would rather censor the whole internet before putting people who have credible allegations of sex crimes against children under investigation and in handcuffs when appropriate.
If you don't fight government overreach now, it becomes permanent.
I wonder what the difference in legal traditions is between the US and the Old World. The latter have a lot of "Yes, you're technically in trouble under the guidelines the enforcement authority rules using but they're going to make an exception for you, for now" and the former have a lot of "Yes, the spirit was to block this kind of thing but the letter of the law is that you do get away with it".

What informed this kind of difference? Is there one?

The US approach seems very much like the way Orthodox Jews follow the halakha by making workarounds around it.

> based on a novel reading of the law

So they found a loop hole. Why do they need to find a loop hole in their own law, why not just make better laws to start with.

You know why all who grew up under the soviet regime in the eastern block are totally alergic to englands direction nowadaways.
Sadly many of those countries are now in the EU which will force them to adopt similar legislation
Identity verification should be illegal by default and companies that want to do it should have to prove it's absolutely necessary for their business.
The Ministry of Truth approves of Wikipedia, for now.

I suppose it's part of UK culture to be authoritarian which is how Orwell predicted it, but it's uncanny.

Oh so the muppets have finally started thinking about the practicalities of what they’re yolo legislating
I don't get the anglo mind. They set up the same 1984 esque institutions in the subcontinent. Just why. Does it tickle their mind to control informantion or something ? Is is the boarding schools?
It's more like, “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely." If there is no or not enough resistance, certain sadists and egomaniacs see that as a sign to power grab and cause suffering.