Governments would rather censor the whole internet before putting people who have credible allegations of sex crimes against children under investigation and in handcuffs when appropriate.
I wonder what the difference in legal traditions is between the US and the Old World. The latter have a lot of "Yes, you're technically in trouble under the guidelines the enforcement authority rules using but they're going to make an exception for you, for now" and the former have a lot of "Yes, the spirit was to block this kind of thing but the letter of the law is that you do get away with it".
What informed this kind of difference? Is there one?
The US approach seems very much like the way Orthodox Jews follow the halakha by making workarounds around it.
I don't get the anglo mind. They set up the same 1984 esque institutions in the subcontinent. Just why. Does it tickle their mind to control informantion or something ?
Is is the boarding schools?
It's more like, “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely." If there is no or not enough resistance, certain sadists and egomaniacs see that as a sign to power grab and cause suffering.
18 comments
[ 3.7 ms ] story [ 44.0 ms ] threadI'm not sure if Ofcom's subsequent notification to WMF is publicly available anywhere.
What informed this kind of difference? Is there one?
The US approach seems very much like the way Orthodox Jews follow the halakha by making workarounds around it.
So they found a loop hole. Why do they need to find a loop hole in their own law, why not just make better laws to start with.
I suppose it's part of UK culture to be authoritarian which is how Orwell predicted it, but it's uncanny.