Ask HN: Should I do a masters at Cambridge or start as a new grad at Amazon?
Basically what the title says. I'm in the very fortunate position to be able to decide between the two trajectories. What do you recommend if my goals are flexibility and money in the long term?
71 comments
[ 3.1 ms ] story [ 43.6 ms ] thread(i've been in industry for 18+ years, went to a name brand school, and live in the heart of silicon valley. Cambridge, i'd imagine, gives you at the least a more interesting story, and at the most a different opportunity set. amazon is now the lower bar of what you should hope to attain after Cambridge.)
Will your grad school work be done in a year resulting in the equivalent of an MS, or are you looking at a phd or longer timeframe? Shorter timeframe is better, then you can torture yourself again by looking for a job after the MS. Are you studying something you like, is it relevant with today's AI craze or not? Do you feel excited and passionate, do you care about getting an MS?
No one can predict what the job market will be in a year, will we be in a widespread depression? More likely it will be like today, economy ok but unclear future as the world muddles through. Even if you go there now, amazon could lay you and your division off and you'd be scrambling for a new job to stay in the US (presuming you aren't a us citizen). Or maybe your grad school work would make you more employable (or you work on something at amazon that is hot), depends on the area.
I was excited to go to grad school and was glad I went because my undergrad wasn't an especially great school. Then I went to big tech after grad school years passed. If you are excited about grad school and it's not a many year commitment then I'd go that. If you are hot to come to Seattle or where-ever, and you are paid enough to live there, and/or Amazon offers you a job working in something that excites you then do that. No easy answers in life.
This feels like a wishy-washy answer but everyone has to decide for themselves.
Good instrument from PT!
Another one: "Try to think forward 5 years, what would you regret more?" - in this case: - Cambridge Degree
- Amazon Job
(WOW, while doing this exercise it went very clear for me!)
For what exactly?
Amazon will still be there, if that’s what you decide for your soul afterward. If you made the cut now, you’ll make the cut again in future.
The world is so much bigger than commerce. Even if you choose to work the world of commerce, you’ll have a richer experience of it, and bring more subtle value to your professional career, entering into it with eyes that can see other hues in the outside world. And a cohort of smart thoughtful humans who are engaging with the world from other perspectives, as you all go into the decades ahead.
Today, if I had no pressure to start working, I'd do Cambridge. Due to AI, much is in flux in software engineering today and I don't think you lose anything by waiting a bit to see where the chips fall _and_ getting some valuable credentials in the meantime. Get experience with something that will be valuable in the AI business in the coming years.
You can always get your Masters if you get laid off. Jobs are precious especially for new grads. Do not make the mistake of passing over this job offer, it’s worth so much more than a masters degree. You can always get your master’s later on, for example if you get laid off from Amazon and can’t find another job.
I loved doing a masters as a mature student, but I was very lucky to be able to do so.
School won't always be so easy. Do school.
Also, Amazon are gross.
If you have to pay -lets say- 30.000 bucks, rethink.
The additional time of being student will open you newer doors, than if you are already working - assumption: IF the CS master is free, otherwise it may not pay off
Being a student is a huge privilege in most countries accordings to different costs/fees/taxes - so I recommend everyone to keep this status, as long AS IT IS FREE and legally possible.
I've hired ex-Amazon engineers at Google who believe that your job is to fuck over as many other teams as possible in the name of delivering your feature as quickly as possible so you can climb the ladder, and who believe your manager's job is to back you up while you fuck over those other teams and steal credit from other engineers on them. They tend to struggle in Google's more collaborative culture, and I'd imagine they'd also struggle in other companies that are a little less sociopathic. The problem is particularly acute with people who have never worked anywhere but Amazon; older employees coming out of Amazon are more like "Well, that's just how Amazon is, I'll adapt myself to whatever culture my current job has", but junior engineers are often shaped and molded by it because they've never known anything else.
I'm often a big fan of going to industry early because a.) you make more money early which can then compound and b.) you actually do learn a lot of tacit knowledge working in industry, very often more relevant than what you'd learn as a student. But if the choice is between Amazon and Cambridge I would probably do Cambridge.
If I was in your position I would try to combine masters with working at a startup or a small company.
That's an entirely different direction from an Amazon L2/L3 or whatever. If you want to be a professional software engineer the answer is to take the Amazon job. The MPhil will not make you a better engineer. Experience will. As far as I know, you need to have a pretty strong Bachelors to qualify for that anyway so your basics are probably already good enough to the degree required for professional software engineering.
On the other hand, if you want a Ph.D. you are realistically closing your door to it by taking the Amazon gig. Once you start, you will find that the income you get is so much higher than you've had before and grows so much faster that you will be trapped by your now-very-visible opportunity cost.
The final thing, though, is that the market is in massive flux now. No one knows what the shape of jobs in the future will be like. Coding agents are already very good but no one has successfully managed to use them to lead frontier-grade research in software. They still hire Ph.D.s to do that.
In your position, I'd take the ramp on the Amazon ladder (and I did do a similar thing - going to industry over academia) but I will tell you that for those who I knew who did Ph.Ds the top few languished for 10 years (in comparison to those of us who went to industry) but then suddenly with the AI revolution in the last few they're doing well. A Ph.D. is far away from today. You've got your one-year MPhil to do and then the actual research. Long way to go and the intermediate step yields nothing.
Over the long term (assuming the next 10-15 years) getting more experience with building, communicating, and operating systems that solve business problems will get you more cash.
In theory, that masters may boost your starting comp but in the longer term, your comp would likely end up similar. I've worked on numerous teams with a mix of all academic levels and it has never been a huge predictor of comp.
Take this with a grain of salt, it's all anecdotal :).
---
Congrats on 2 wonderful options!